Scientific advice in China: the changing role of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

作者: Xiaoxuan Li , Kejia Yang , Xiaoxi Xiao

DOI: 10.1057/PALCOMMS.2016.45

关键词: Management systemProsperitySociologyCentral governmentChinaLawGovernmentPublic administrationOrganizational structurePosition (finance)Function (engineering)

摘要: This article explores the changing role of Chinese Academy Sciences (CAS) in national scientific advisory system China from an historical perspective, which has been divided into three periods. Period I (from 1949 to 1976) relates era during which, since its establishment, CAS assumed top-level advisor government, and dual “scientific body” “science technology administrative organ” were especially evident formulation “The Twelve-Year National Long-term Outline for Science Technology Development (1956–1967)”. During period II 1977 2011) function providing advice government was restored after “Cultural Revolution”, entered a new unprecedented prosperity development. Finally, III 2012 present) includes President Xi Jinping taking office, central encouraging development science think tanks, using third-party evaluation as important measure approach promote reform management system. In summary, attaches great importance CAS, urging it, organization, fully play further develop capability approaches consulting, improve organizational structure. Given prominent position system, also reflects characteristics changes China’s throughout different is published part collection on governments.

参考文章(12)
Robert Doubleday, James Wilsdon, Future directions for scientific advice in Whitehall Alliance for Useful Evidence & Cambridge Centre for Science and Policy. ,(2013)
Peter Collins, Quality control in scientific policy advice: the experience of the Royal Society The Politics of Scientific Advice. pp. 334- 341 ,(2011) , 10.1017/CBO9780511777141.018
T. Arimoto, Y. Sato, Rebuilding Public Trust in Science for Policy-Making Science. ,vol. 337, pp. 1176- 1177 ,(2012) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1224004
Cong Cao, China's Scientific Elite ,(2004)
Cong Cao, Richard P. Suttmeier, China's "Brain Bank": Leadership and Elitism in Chinese Science and Engineering Asian Survey. ,vol. 39, pp. 525- 559 ,(1999) , 10.2307/3021212
Sheila Jasanoff, Joel R. Primack, The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers ,(1990)