A network analysis to identify forest merchantability limitations across the United States

作者: Raju Pokharel , Gregory S. Latta

DOI: 10.1016/J.FORPOL.2020.102181

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Large-scale silvicultural programs designed to alter forest characteristics accomplish either financial or ecological goals often involve the extraction of significant volumes. The operational costs, and thus extend over which these can be applied, depend in large part on supply chain considerations degree removals merchandized. Forestry include spatial allocation products processing facilities, array primary commodities they consume, transportation infrastructure. This study conducts a network analysis utilizing location 2543 product producers contiguous United States along with national road dataset evaluate hotspots where better opportunity merchandise enables flexibility management, coldspots alternatives are limited. establishes service areas facilities for sawlogs, pulpwood, biomass at varying haul-times two scenarios as function costs constructs Cumulative Merchantability Index (CMI) by summing values defining current market extent. In Short Haul scenario, 26% (61.71 million hectares) Long 9% (21.32 forests have low merchantability all three commodities. Only 3% 20% scenario an Results helpful prioritizing differing management objectives evaluating potential cost saving afforded selling

参考文章(43)
William J. Elliot, Fei Pan, Leonard R. Johnson, Han Sup Han, Production and cost of harvesting, processing, and transporting small-diameter (≤5 inches) trees for energy. Forest Products Journal. ,vol. 58, pp. 47- 53 ,(2008)
Rachel E. Schwartz, Alexander Gershunov, Sam F. Iacobellis, Daniel R. Cayan, North American west coast summer low cloudiness: Broadscale variability associated with sea surface temperature Geophysical Research Letters. ,vol. 41, pp. 3307- 3314 ,(2014) , 10.1002/2014GL059825
Robert C. Abt, Karen L. Abt, Frederick W. Cubbage, Projecting southern timber supply for multiple products by subregion Forest Products Journal. ,vol. 59, pp. 7- 16 ,(2009)
Philip E. Dennison, Simon C. Brewer, James D. Arnold, Max A. Moritz, Large wildfire trends in the western United States, 1984-2011 Geophysical Research Letters. ,vol. 41, pp. 2928- 2933 ,(2014) , 10.1002/2014GL059576
Leonard Johnson, Bruce Lippke, Elaine Oneil, Modeling Biomass Collection and Woods Processing Life-Cycle Analysis* Forest Products Journal. ,vol. 62, pp. 258- 272 ,(2012) , 10.13073/FPJ-D-12-00019.1
Matthew Hurteau, Malcolm North, Fuel treatment effects on tree‐based forest carbon storage and emissions under modeled wildfire scenarios Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. ,vol. 7, pp. 409- 414 ,(2009) , 10.1890/080049
Bruce R. Hartsough, Scott Abrams, R. James Barbour, Erik S. Drews, James D. McIver, Jason J. Moghaddas, Dylan W. Schwilk, Scott L. Stephens, The economics of alternative fuel reduction treatments in western United States dry forests: Financial and policy implications from the National Fire and Fire Surrogate Study Forest Policy and Economics. ,vol. 10, pp. 344- 354 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.FORPOL.2008.02.001
R. James Barbour, Jeremy S. Fried, Peter J. Daugherty, Glenn Christensen, Roger Fight, Potential biomass and logs from fire-hazard-reduction treatments in Southwest Oregon and Northern California Forest Policy and Economics. ,vol. 10, pp. 400- 407 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.FORPOL.2008.02.003
Nazanin Shabani, Shaghaygh Akhtari, Taraneh Sowlati, Value chain optimization of forest biomass for bioenergy production: A review Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. ,vol. 23, pp. 299- 311 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.RSER.2013.03.005
Robert C. Abt, Karen L. Abt, Potential Impact of Bioenergy Demand on the Sustainability of the Southern Forest Resource Journal of Sustainable Forestry. ,vol. 32, pp. 175- 194 ,(2013) , 10.1080/10549811.2011.652044