Models in explanations, Part 1 : Horses for courses?

作者: John K. Gilbert , Carolyn Boulter , Margaret Rutherford

DOI: 10.1080/0950069980200106

关键词:

摘要: This is the first of two papers which seeks to identify some issues associated with role models in scientific explanations. Starting from a broad definition, typology explanations developed and notion ‘appropriateness’ explored. Some characteristics sought provided for by scientists, science curricula, teachers students are identified. Finally, nature their contribution In Part 2 (Gilbert et al. 1998), understandings generated discussed, together an appraisal those not commonly or attempted.

参考文章(27)
Mike Watts, Alan West, Progress through Problems, Not Recipes for Disaster. The School science review. ,vol. 73, pp. 57- 64 ,(1992)
Mike Watts, Science in the national curriculum Cassell. ,(1991)
Mary B. Hesse, Models and analogies in science ,(1970)
Douglas R. Barnes, Harold Rosen, James N. Britton, Language, the learner, and the school ,(1969)
John Fauvel, Robin Wilson, Raymond Flood, Michael Shortland, Let Newton Be ApOpt. ,vol. 28, pp. 1868- ,(1988)
Paolo Guidoni, On natural thinking The European Journal of Science Education. ,vol. 7, pp. 133- 140 ,(1985) , 10.1080/0140528850070204
Richard Bowe, Stephen J. Ball, Anne Gold, Reforming education and changing schools ,(1992)
Eleanor Abrams, James H. Wandersee, How does biological knowledge grow? a study of life scientists' research practices Journal of Research in Science Teaching. ,vol. 32, pp. 649- 663 ,(1995) , 10.1002/TEA.3660320609
Douglas A. Roberts, Junior high school science transformed: analysing a science curriculum policy change International Journal of Science Education. ,vol. 17, pp. 493- 504 ,(1995) , 10.1080/0950069950170408