Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results
作者： Clarisse Dromain , Fabienne Thibault , Serge Muller , Françoise Rimareix , Suzette Delaloge
DOI: 10.1007/S00330-010-1944-Y
关键词:
摘要: Objective To assess the diagnostic accuracy of Dual-Energy Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM) as an adjunct to mammography (MX) versus MX alone and plus ultrasound (US).
springer.com
paperity.org参考文章(23)
, Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography : 1. Further confirmation with extended data Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers. ,vol. 15, pp. 45- 51 ,(2006) , 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0349
R D Rosenberg, W C Hunt, M R Williamson, F D Gilliland, P W Wiest, C A Kelsey, C R Key, M N Linver, Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Radiology. ,vol. 209, pp. 511- 518 ,(1998) , 10.1148/RADIOLOGY.209.2.9807581
Suzie J Otto, Jacques Fracheboud, Caspar WN Looman, Mireille JM Broeders, Rob Boer, Jan HCL Hendriks, André LM Verbeek, Harry J de Koning, None, Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality: a systematic review. The Lancet. ,vol. 361, pp. 1411- 1417 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13132-7
John M. Lewin, Pamela K. Isaacs, Virginia Vance, Fred J. Larke, Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Subtraction Mammography: Feasibility Radiology. ,vol. 229, pp. 261- 268 ,(2003) , 10.1148/RADIOL.2291021276
Sylvie Puong, Xavier Bouchevreau, Fanny Patoureaux, Razvan Iordache, Serge Muller, Dual-energy contrast enhanced digital mammography using a new approach for breast tissue canceling Medical Imaging 2007: Physics of Medical Imaging. ,vol. 6510, ,(2007) , 10.1117/12.710133
Thomas M. Kolb, Jacob Lichy, Jeffrey H. Newhouse, Comparison of the Performance of Screening Mammography, Physical Examination, and Breast US and Evaluation of Factors that Influence Them: An Analysis of 27,825 Patient Evaluations Radiology. ,vol. 225, pp. 165- 175 ,(2002) , 10.1148/RADIOL.2251011667
T M Kolb, J Lichy, J H Newhouse, Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US--diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics Radiology. ,vol. 207, pp. 191- 199 ,(1998) , 10.1148/RADIOLOGY.207.1.9530316
Mia Skarpathiotakis, Martin J. Yaffe, Aili K. Bloomquist, Dan Rico, Serge Muller, Andreas Rick, Fanny Jeunehomme, Development of contrast digital mammography Medical Physics. ,vol. 29, pp. 2419- 2426 ,(2002) , 10.1118/1.1510128
Wendie A. Berg, Lorena Gutierrez, Moriel S. NessAiver, W. Bradford Carter, Mythreyi Bhargavan, Rebecca S. Lewis, Olga B. Ioffe, Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. ,vol. 233, pp. 830- 849 ,(2004) , 10.1148/RADIOL.2333031484
Roberta A. Jong, Martin J. Yaffe, Mia Skarpathiotakis, Rene S. Shumak, Nathalie M. Danjoux, Anoma Gunesekara, Donald B. Plewes, Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience. Radiology. ,vol. 228, pp. 842- 850 ,(2003) , 10.1148/RADIOL.2283020961