How we know about death: Research strategies

作者: Tillman Rodabough

DOI: 10.1080/07481188108253353

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Current writings on death and dying are trichotomized into three major categories the basis of how knowledge was acquired: prescientific, quasi-scientific, scientific. Various methods acquisition within each category discussed, methodological problems unique to research outlined. It is argued that, though findings, no matter what their source, valuable in constructing larger, composite picture, all findings should not be treated as equally valid. Rather, some may used supply hypotheses others test them still further validate previous findings.

参考文章(26)
Avery D. Weisman, On dying and denying: A psychiatric study of terminality. Behavioral Publications. ,(1972)
Derryl Harris, Jean Goodwin, Suicide in pregnancy: the Hedda Gabler syndrome. Suicide and Life Threatening Behavior. ,vol. 9, pp. 105- 115 ,(1979) , 10.1111/J.1943-278X.1979.TB00435.X
Dale Vincent Hardt, An Investigation of the Stages of Bereavement. Omega-journal of Death and Dying. ,vol. 9, pp. 279- 285 ,(1979) , 10.2190/AD9N-HGBR-1F4B-CD3K
Herman Feifel, Allan B. Branscomb, Who's afraid of death? Journal of Abnormal Psychology. ,vol. 81, pp. 282- 288 ,(1973) , 10.1037/H0034519
James C. Diggory, Doreen Z. Rothman, Values destroyed by death. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. ,vol. 63, pp. 205- 210 ,(1961) , 10.1037/H0040194
Jaber F. Gubrium, Living and Dying at Murray Manor ,(1975)