Decomposition for emission baseline setting in China's electricity sector

作者: Paul A. Steenhof

DOI: 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2005.11.024

关键词:

摘要: Decomposition analysis is used to generate carbon dioxide emission baselines in China's electricity sector the year 2020. This undertaken from vantage point of final consumer electricity, and therefore considers factors influencing demand, efficiency generation, sources energy for generation purposes, effectiveness transmission distribution. It found that since 1980, gains have been most important factor affecting change intensity generated. Based upon known economic policy, will continue contribute reductions generated, however, fuel shifts natural gas increases nuclear further these trends into future. The confirms other literature decomposition an appropriate technique available baseline construction, thereby suitable emerging market its related mechanisms.

参考文章(15)
中華人民共和国国家統計局, China statistical yearbook International Centre for the Advancement of Science & Technology Ltd , China Statistical Information & Consultancy Service Centre. ,(1988)
Jayant Sathaye, Scott Murtishaw, Lynn Price, Maurice Lefranc, Joyashree Roy, Harald Winkler, Randall Spalding-Fecher, Multiproject baselines for evaluation of electric power projects Energy Policy. ,vol. 32, pp. 1303- 1317 ,(2004) , 10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00098-3
Eric D. Larson, Wu Zongxin, Pat DeLaquil, Chen Wenying, Gao Pengfei, Future implications of China's energy-technology choices Energy Policy. ,vol. 31, pp. 1189- 1204 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00171-4
Lei Duan, Jiming Hao, Shaodong Xie, Ke Du, Critical loads of acidity for surface waters in China. Science of The Total Environment. ,vol. 246, pp. 1- 10 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00347-2
Paul Crompton, Yanrui Wu, Energy consumption in China: past trends and future directions Energy Economics. ,vol. 27, pp. 195- 208 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.ENECO.2004.10.006
Joseph Alcamo, Eric Kreileman, Emission scenarios and global climate protection Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions. ,vol. 6, pp. 305- 334 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0959-3780(96)00030-1