Primary care-led commissioning and public involvement in the English National Health Service. Lessons from the past

作者: Christina Petsoulas , Stephen Peckham , Jane Smiddy , Patricia Wilson

DOI: 10.1017/S1463423614000486

关键词:

摘要: Background Patient and Public involvement (PPI) in health care occupies a central place Western democracies. In England, this theme has been continuously prominent since the introduction of market reforms early 1990s. The implemented by current Coalition Government are making primary practitioners main commissioners services National Health Service, duty is placed on them to involve public commissioning decisions strategies. Since implementation PPI initiatives not new, we asked how likely it that new will make difference. We scanned literature related care-led found little evidence effective thus far. suggest unless scope intended objectives clarified appropriate resources devoted it, continue remain empty rhetoric box ticking. Aim To examine effect previous draw lessons for future development. Method reporting internal 1991. particular, looked specific contexts, methods outcomes such initiatives. Findings 1. constantly encouraged policy makers England. 2. Research shows limited so 3. Constant reconfiguration structures had negative impact PPI. 4. look hardly better poised bring about patient involvement.

参考文章(89)
J Smith, D Baines, E Regen, J Shapiro, National evaluation of general practitioner commissioning pilots: lessons for primary care groups. British Journal of General Practice. ,vol. 50, pp. 469- 472 ,(2000)
Rob Baggott, Kathryn L. Jones, Judith Allsop, Speaking for Patients and Carers: Health Consumer Groups and the Policy Process ,(2004)
Caroline Glendinning, Bernard Dowling, The New Primary Care: Modern, Dependable, Successful? ,(2003)
G. Malbon, N. Mays, S. Wyke, N. Goodwin, The purchasing of health care by primary care organizations: an evaluation and guide to future policy Open University Press. ,(2001)
Philip Crowley, Judith Green, Debbie Freake, Chris Drinkwater, Primary Care Trusts involving the community: is community development the way forward? Journal of Management in Medicine. ,vol. 16, pp. 311- 322 ,(2002) , 10.1108/02689230210445121
Pauline Allen, Jean Townsend, Paul Dempster, John Wright, Andrew Hutchings, Justin Keen, Organizational Form as a Mechanism to Involve Staff, Public and Users in Public Services: A Study of the Governance of NHS Foundation Trusts Social Policy & Administration. ,vol. 46, pp. 239- 257 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1467-9515.2011.00820.X
Sophie Staniszewska, Ade Adebajo, Rosemary Barber, Peter Beresford, Louca-Mai Brady, Jo Brett, Jim Elliott, David Evans, Kirstie L. Haywood, David Jones, Carole Mockford, Mary Nettle, Diana Rose, Tracey Williamson, Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: the case for measuring impact International Journal of Consumer Studies. ,vol. 35, pp. 628- 632 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1470-6431.2011.01020.X
Marion Barnes, Phil Cotterell, None, Critical perspectives on user involvement ,(2011)
C. Cotterell, Marian Barnes, From margin to mainstream The Policy Press. ,(2012)