A quality framework for personalised residential supports for adults with developmental disabilities.

作者: E. Cocks , R. Boaden

DOI: 10.1111/J.1365-2788.2010.01296.X

关键词:

摘要: Background  The Personalised Residential Supports (PRS) Project provided detailed information about the nature, purposes and outcomes of PRS from perspectives key stakeholder groups including people with developmental disabilities, family members service providers. Although these forms support have developed over past two decades, there is a dearth empirical work that has explored characteristics PRS. In contrast, multitude studies on congregate residential clear trend towards study relatively small, settings. Methods  was conceived initially in as having four criteria arrangements – high degree of: individualisation; individual/family influence; informal relationships; and, person-centredness. Four methods data collection were used to develop descriptive framework for PRS: review literature met inclusion criteria; case carried out 2 years six adults whose living initial focus group disabilities; series written surveys 18 who ‘experts’ their experience knowledge PRS-type arrangements. latter included members, providers policymakers. Each dataset analysed separately independently by authors third researcher, followed process conciliation consensus which quality developed. Two iterations expert fine tune framework. Results  Qualitative analysis resulted made up nine themes containing 28 attributes. Descriptions each theme attribute are provided. named as: Assumptions, Leadership, My Home, One Person at Time, Planning, Control, Support, Thriving Social Inclusion. Conclusion  This identified reported groups. On face value, expressed relevance all supported accommodation, many different people. research continuing further development will enable its use evaluation existing or planned

参考文章(22)
Jan Tossebro, Impact of size revisited: relation of number of residents to self-determination and deprivatization. American Journal on Mental Retardation. ,vol. 100, pp. 59- 67 ,(1995)
R Matthias, T M Franke, A E Benjamin, Comparing consumer-directed and agency models for providing supportive services at home. Health Services Research. ,vol. 35, pp. 351- 366 ,(2000)
Jane Mattson Prince, M. Scott Manley, Gale G. Whiteneck, Self-managed versus agency-provided personal assistance care for individuals with high level tetraplegia Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 76, pp. 919- 923 ,(1995) , 10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80067-0
Timo Saloviita, Margot Åberg, Self-Determination in Hospital, Community Group Homes, and Apartments British Journal of Developmental Disabilities. ,vol. 46, pp. 23- 29 ,(2000) , 10.1179/096979500799155766
Phillip W. Beatty, Gordon W. Richmond, Sherri Tepper, Gerben DeJong, Personal assistance for people with physical disabilities : Consumer-direction and satisfaction with services Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 79, pp. 674- 677 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90043-0
Pamela Doty, Judith Kasper, Simi Litvak, Consumer-Directed Models of Personal Care: Lessons from Medicaid The Milbank Quarterly. ,vol. 74, pp. 377- 409 ,(1996) , 10.2307/3350306
Roger J. Stancliffe, Brian H. Abery, John Smith, Personal Control and the Ecology of Community Living Settings: Beyond Living-Unit Size and Type American Journal on Mental Retardation. ,vol. 105, pp. 431- 454 ,(2000) , 10.1352/0895-8017(2000)105<0431:PCATEO>2.0.CO;2