Spatial Market Arbitrage and Threshold Cointegration

作者: Peter S. Sephton

DOI: 10.1111/1467-8276.00506

关键词:

摘要: Goodwin and Piggott reported that corn soybean prices in spatially separated markets North Carolina exhibited threshold cointegration commodity different may persistently diverge. Here, a multivariate approach is used to test for nonlinear cointegration. The results suggest departures from the law of one price do not persist indefinitely. (GP) examined daily across bivariate pairings were threshold-cointegrated. GP twothreshold model which differences could They concluded empirical models should consider effects order adequately characterize integrated markets. purpose this article extend analysis several directions. employed techniques Martens, Kofman, Vorst involve multistepped search thresholds residuals cointegrating regression. This single-equation process subject potential misspecification, so it interesting determine whether direct Hansen Seo provides confirmatory evidence. In addition, allowed two affect each pair without directly testing number thresholds. second extension uses tests Two imply no-arbitrage bounds allow persistent price. One consistent with traditional view differentials are fleeting as arbitrageurs drive excess returns zero. final recognizes might follow relationship depends on transactions costs. Peter S. Sephton professor, School Business, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. author would like thank Nick providing his dataset Dean’s Research Fund Business financial assistance. anonymous referees provided helpful comments. Sufficiently “large” deviations lead reduced dispersion. A demonstrates tend be resolved over time. Background

参考文章(16)
Denis Kwiatkowski, Peter C.B. Phillips, Peter Schmidt, Yongcheol Shin, Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics. ,vol. 54, pp. 159- 178 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y
S∅ren Johansen, Katarina Juselius, Testing structural hypotheses in a multivariate cointegration analysis of the PPP and the UIP for UK Journal of Econometrics. ,vol. 53, pp. 211- 244 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0304-4076(92)90086-7
Herman J. Bierens, Nonparametric cointegration analysis Journal of Econometrics. ,vol. 77, pp. 379- 404 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0304-4076(96)01820-9
B.M. Roehner, The correlation length of commodity markets. 2. Theoretical framework European Physical Journal B. ,vol. 13, pp. 189- 200 ,(2000) , 10.1007/S100510050022
Peter S. Sephton, Cointegration tests on MARS Computing in Economics and Finance. ,vol. 7, pp. 23- 35 ,(1994) , 10.1007/BF01299327
Jerry Coakley, Ana-María Fuertes, Nonparametric cointegration analysis of real exchange rates Applied Financial Economics. ,vol. 11, pp. 1- 8 ,(2001) , 10.1080/09603100150210200
Martin Martens, Paul Kofman, Ton C. F. Vorst, A threshold error‐correction model for intraday futures and index returns Journal of Applied Econometrics. ,vol. 13, pp. 245- 263 ,(1998) , 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199805/06)13:3<245::AID-JAE480>3.0.CO;2-E
Josep Lluı́s Carrion-i-Silvestre, Andreu Sansó-i-Rosselló, Manuel Artı́s Ortuño, Unit root and stationarity tests’ wedding Economics Letters. ,vol. 70, pp. 1- 8 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00348-7
S. J. Leybourne, B. P. M. HcCabe, Modified Stationarity Tests With Data-Dependent Model-Selection Rules Journal of Business & Economic Statistics. ,vol. 17, pp. 264- 270 ,(1999) , 10.1080/07350015.1999.10524816
Barry K. Goodwin, Nicholas E. Piggott, Spatial Market Integration in the Presence of Threshold Effects American Journal of Agricultural Economics. ,vol. 83, pp. 302- 317 ,(2001) , 10.1111/0002-9092.00157