A randomized trial of standard chemotherapy v a high-dose chemotherapy regimen in the treatment of poor prognosis nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors.

作者: R F Ozols , D C Ihde , W M Linehan , J Jacob , Y Ostchega

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.6.1031

关键词:

摘要: We performed a prospective randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy regimen v standard cisplatin-based in poor prognosis nonseminomatous germ-cell cancer patients. The consisting twice the dose cisplatin (P), along with vinblastine (Ve), bleomycin (B), and epipodophylotoxin etoposide (VP-16) (V) (PVeBV) was compared to classic normal cisplatin, vinblastine, (PVeB). Eligibility criteria included large abdominal masses, liver metastases, multiple pulmonary brain marked elevations serum tumor markers (alpha-fetoprotein greater than 1,000 ng/mL or beta-subunit human chorionic gonadotropin 10,000 mIU), unfavorable histology (pure choriocarcinoma), extragonadal tumors. Fifty-two consecutive patients prognostic features were receive either PVeBV PVeB. median follow-up is 4 years. Treatment increased complete remission rate (88% 67%, P = .14) associated lower relapse (17% 41%, .2). survival receiving therapy 30 months, while for has not been reached. Actuarial 5-year treated 78%, 48% (two-sided Mantel-Cox test .06). Disease-free also superior (P .03). Sixty-eight percent (23 34) are alive continuously disease-free, 33% (six 18) PVeB .02). major difference toxicity between severity myelosuppression incidence severe hearing loss. Ninety-one had WBC count less 1,000/microL, 50% .05). Hearing aids recommended 12 who received two effectiveness may relate double-dose addition VP-16, synergistic effect these drugs.

参考文章(21)
Robert B. Golbery, Nancy L. Geller, Howard Scher, Nicholas J. Vogelzang, Jerome Nisselbaum, Willet F. Whitmore, B. J. Kennedy, George J. Bosl, Davor Vugrin, Constance Cirrincione, Multivariate analysis of prognostic variables in patients with metastatic testicular cancer. Cancer Research. ,vol. 43, pp. 3403- 3407 ,(1983)
M.K. Samson, R. Fisher, R.L. Stephens, S. Rivkin, M. Opipari, T. Maloney, C.W. Groppe, Vinblastine, bleomycin and Cis-diamminedichloroplatinum in disseminated testicular cancer: Response to treatment and prognostic correlations European Journal of Cancer (1965). ,vol. 16, pp. 1359- 1366 ,(1980) , 10.1016/0014-2964(80)90295-9
E. L. Kaplan, Paul Meier, Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations Springer Series in Statistics. ,vol. 53, pp. 319- 337 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_25
Stephen D Williams, Lawrence H Einhorn, F Anthony Greco, Robert Oldham, Ronald Fletcher, None, VP-16–213 salvage therapy for refractory germinal neoplasms Cancer. ,vol. 46, pp. 2154- 2158 ,(1980) , 10.1002/1097-0142(19801115)46:10<2154::AID-CNCR2820461008>3.0.CO;2-3
Lawrence H. Einhorn, Have new aggressive chemotherapy regimens improved results in advanced germ cell tumors European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 22, pp. 1289- 1293 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0277-5379(86)90135-5
Robert F. Ozols, Albert B. Deisseroth, Nasser Javadpour, Audrey Barlock, Gerald L. Messerschmidt, Robert C. Young, Treatment of poor prognosis nonseminomatous testicular cancer with a “high-dose” platinum combination chemotherapy regimen Cancer. ,vol. 51, pp. 1803- 1807 ,(1983) , 10.1002/1097-0142(19830515)51:10<1803::AID-CNCR2820511008>3.0.CO;2-F
ROBERT F. OZOLS, High-Dose Cisplatin in Hypertonic Saline Annals of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 100, pp. 19- 24 ,(1984) , 10.7326/0003-4819-100-1-19
Michael K. Samson, Saul E. Rivkin, Stephen E. Jones, John J. Costanzi, Albert F. Lobuglio, Ronald L. Stephens, Edmund A. Gehan, Glenn D. Cummings, Dose-response and dose-survival advantage for high versus low-dose cisplatin combined with vinblastine and bleomycin in disseminated testicular cancer a southwest oncology group study Cancer. ,vol. 53, pp. 1029- 1035 ,(1984) , 10.1002/1097-0142(19840301)53:5<1029::AID-CNCR2820530503>3.0.CO;2-Z
E.S Newlands, G.J.S Rustin, R.H.J Begent, D Parker, K.D Bagshawe, FURTHER ADVANCES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF MALIGNANT TERATOMAS OF THE TESTIS AND OTHER SITES The Lancet. ,vol. 321, pp. 948- 951 ,(1983) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(83)92079-2