Humanitarian intervention revisited: Post‐cold war responses to classical problems

作者: Tonny Brems Knudsen

DOI: 10.1080/13533319608413644

关键词:

摘要: Ever since the idea of humanitarian intervention was born in minds pre‐Westphalian writers like Grotius, Gentili and Suarez, it has been disputed theory practice international relations on grounds that threatens institutional bases order. But just how serious are problems intervention, will they prove to be fatal for early post‐Cold War experiment with military humanitarianism? To answer these questions this article offers a distinction between ‘systemic’ threatening working society, operational successful implementation given intervention. While traditional fear undermining order should not taken decisive argument against right recent attempts realize ideals humanitarianism have some cases severely plagued by stalemate poor resu...

参考文章(30)
John C. Campbell, Hedley Bull, Adam Watson, The Expansion of International Society Foreign Affairs. ,vol. 63, pp. 411- ,(1984) , 10.2307/20042191
Richard B. Lillich, Rita E. Hauser, Humanitarian Intervention and the United Nations ,(1973)
Mats R. Berdal, Fateful Encounter: The United States and UN peacekeeping Survival. ,vol. 36, pp. 30- 50 ,(1994) , 10.1080/00396339408442722
Hedley Bull, ORDER vs. JUSTICE IN INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY Political Studies. ,vol. 19, pp. 269- 283 ,(1971) , 10.1111/J.1467-9248.1971.TB00674.X
Philip Zelikow, The new concert of Europe Survival. ,vol. 34, pp. 12- 30 ,(1992) , 10.1080/00396339208442639
Michael Pugh, Humanitarianism and peacekeeping Global Society. ,vol. 10, pp. 205- 224 ,(1996) , 10.1080/13600829608443110
Martin Wight, Brian Porter, Gabriele Wright, International Theory: The Three Traditions ,(1991)
Nicholas J. Wheeler, Pluralist or Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention: Millennium: Journal of International Studies. ,vol. 21, pp. 463- 487 ,(1992) , 10.1177/03058298920210030201