DNA Databases–The Significance of Unique Hits and the Database Controversy
作者： Ronald Meester
DOI: 10.1002/9780470061589.FSA1036
关键词:
摘要: We discuss the database controversy, which deals with evaluation of evidential value a unique match in search. conclude that principle, case against suspect is stronger than so-called “cold” case, but contrary to popular idea, this not because likelihood ratio increases when compared cold posterior odds are higher case. Keywords: DNA database; unique hit; prior odds; posterior odds; weight evidence; database controversy; likelihood ratio; hypothesis testing
core.ac.uk
narcis.nl参考文章(7)
David J. Balding, Peter Donnelly, Evaluating DNA Profile Evidence When the Suspect Is Identified Through a Database Search Journal of Forensic Sciences. ,vol. 41, pp. 603- 607 ,(1996) , 10.1520/JFS13961J
Peter Donnelly, Richard D. Friedman, DNA database searches and the legal consumption of scientific evidence. Michigan Law Review. ,vol. 97, pp. 931- 984 ,(1999) , 10.2307/1290377
Ronald Meester, Marjan Sjerps, The Evidential Value in the DNA Database Search Controversy and the Two-Stain Problem Biometrics. ,vol. 59, pp. 727- 732 ,(2003) , 10.1111/1541-0420.00084
A. Biedermann, S. Gittelson, F. Taroni, Recent misconceptions about the 'database search problem': a probabilistic analysis using Bayesian networks. Forensic Science International. ,vol. 212, pp. 51- 60 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.FORSCIINT.2011.05.013
Anders Stockmarr, Likelihood ratios for evaluating DNA evidence when the suspect is found through a database search. Biometrics. ,vol. 55, pp. 671- 677 ,(1999) , 10.1111/J.0006-341X.1999.00671.X
Klaas Slooten, Ronald Meester, Forensic identification: the island problem and its generalisations Statistica Neerlandica. ,vol. 65, pp. 202- 237 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1467-9574.2011.00484.X
P.M. Schneider, , H. Schneider, R. Fimmers, W. Keil, G. Molsberger, W. Pflug, T. Rothämel, M. Eckert, H. Pfeiffer, B. Brinkmann, Allgemeine Empfehlungen der Spurenkommission zur statistischen Bewertung von DNA-Datenbank-Treffern Rechtsmedizin. ,vol. 20, pp. 111- 115 ,(2010) , 10.1007/S00194-009-0652-X