Which Nature? A Case Study of Whitetop Mountain

作者: D. P. Robertson , R. B. Hull

DOI: 10.3368/LJ.20.2.176

关键词:

摘要: Nature is socially constructed and many different environmental conditions can be considered natural. These assertions have profound implications for landscape design, planning, management. In our case study of Whitetop Mountain, we found four discrete but closely related natures - ecotourism, romanticism, pastoralism, ecologism each which provides a unique way understanding valuing the landscape.These discourses nature describe variety that are both possible acceptable at Mountain. Each discourse suggests definition quality vision mountain's future. conclusion, discuss these differing management natural landscapes propose fifth bioculturalism.

参考文章(63)
J.D. Peine, N.S. Nicholas, C. Eagar, Threatened ecosystem: high elevation spruce-fir forest pp. 431- 454 ,(1999)
J. Baird Callicott, Michael P. Nelson, The Great New Wilderness Debate University of Georgia Press. ,(1998)
Kristin Shrader-Frechette, Hard Ecology, Soft Ecology, and Ecosystem Integrity Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 125- 145 ,(1995) , 10.1007/978-94-011-0451-7_9
William Cronon, Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature W.W. Norton & Co.. ,(1996)
Bernd von Droste zu Hülshoff, Harald Plachter, Mechtild Rössler, Cultural landscapes of universal value : components of a global strategy Gustav Fischer Verlag. ,(1995)
Julia Marie Wondolleck, Public lands conflict and resolution: managing national forest disputes Environment, development, and public policy. Environmental policy and planning (USA). ,(1988)
Reid M. Helford, Constructing nature as constructing science: expertise, activist science, and public conflict in the Chicago wilderness In: Gobster, paul H.; Hull, R. Bruce, ed. Restoring nature: perspectives from the social sciences and humanities. Washington, DC: Island press: 119-142. ,(2000)