Implant retained auricular prosthesis with a modified hader bar: a case report.

作者: M. Lovely , Pradeep C. Dathan , Dinesh Gopal , Biji Thomas George , K. Chandrasekharan Nair

DOI: 10.1007/S13191-013-0277-3

关键词:

摘要: Auricular prostheses for defects of external ear are retained either by mechanical means or implants. All implant various such as bar and clip, magnetic attachments a combination bar, clip magnets. The commonest problem encountered with the system is loosening after 3–4 months. When magnets used retaining component they tend to corrode over period time. So alternative retention methods which possess good retentive qualities, ease reparability patient friendly were tried. In present case newly modified Hader design can act an additional feature apart from employed increase retention. major advantages in that only two implants employed, loops prevented micro movements acrylic locks easy repair if broken. has anti-rotational slots prevents sliding rotation prosthesis gave new confidence who was otherwise worried inadvertent displacement while playing.

参考文章(14)
Andréa Alves de Sousa, Beatriz Silva Câmara Mattos, Magnetic Retention and Bar-Clip Attachment for Implant- Retained Auricular Prostheses: A Comparative Analysis International Journal of Prosthodontics. ,vol. 21, pp. 233- 236 ,(2008)
Yvette F. Solomons, Alan G. T. Payne, Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems. International Journal of Prosthodontics. ,vol. 13, pp. 246- ,(2000)
Hans Peter Hirt, Adrian Lussi, Urs C Belser, Karl Dula, Daniel Buser, Sigurgísli Ingimarsson, Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. ,vol. 22, pp. 109- 117 ,(2002)
Rutger H. K. Batenburg, Henny J. A. Meijer, Gerry M. Raghoebar, Robert P. Van Oort, Geert Boering, Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants. A prospective comparative preliminary study: One‐year results. Clinical Oral Implants Research. ,vol. 9, pp. 374- 383 ,(1998) , 10.1034/J.1600-0501.1996.090603.X
Theodoros Trakas, Konstantinos Michalakis, Kiho Kang, Hiroshi Hirayama, Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review. Implant Dentistry. ,vol. 15, pp. 24- 34 ,(2006) , 10.1097/01.ID.0000202419.21665.36
Zafrulla Khan, Mark Bowden, David Beam, Modified Bar Superstructure for an Implant‐Retained Orbital Prosthesis Journal of Prosthodontics. ,vol. 3, pp. 65- 67 ,(1994) , 10.1111/J.1532-849X.1994.TB00130.X
J.J. Gary, M. Donovan, Retention designs for bone-anchored facial prostheses Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. ,vol. 70, pp. 329- 332 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90217-C
R. Adell, U Lekholm, B. Rockler, P.-I. Brånemark, A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw International Journal of Oral Surgery. ,vol. 10, pp. 387- 416 ,(1981) , 10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
Robin W.C Chung, Adam S.C Siu, Frederick C.S Chu, Tak W Chow, Magnet-retained auricular prosthesis with an implant-supported composite bar: a clinical report The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. ,vol. 89, pp. 446- 449 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00124-0