Attitudes of African Americans Toward Return of Results From Exome and Whole Genome Sequencing

作者: Joon-Ho Yu , Julia Crouch , Seema M. Jamal , Holly K. Tabor , Michael J. Bamshad

DOI: 10.1002/AJMG.A.35914

关键词:

摘要: Exome sequencing and whole genome (ES/WGS) present patients research participants with the opportunity to benefit from a broad scope of genetic results clinical personal utility. Yet, this potential for also risks disenfranchising populations such as African Americans (AAs) that are already underrepresented in utilize tests at lower rates than other populations. Understanding diverse range perspectives on consenting ES/WGS receiving is necessary ensure parity genomic health care research. We conducted series 13 focus groups (n=76) investigate if how attitudes toward participation return differ between self described AAs non-AAs. The majority both non-AAs were willing participate WGS studies receive individual results, but fraction not interested either was higher AAs. This due part different expectations benefits should be managed. Our underscore need develop test culturally tailored strategies returning

参考文章(44)
J. O’Daniel, S.B. Haga, Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results. Public Health Genomics. ,vol. 14, pp. 346- 355 ,(2011) , 10.1159/000324933
Eleanor Singer, Toni Antonucci, John van Hoewyk, Racial and ethnic variations in knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing. Genetic Testing. ,vol. 8, pp. 31- 43 ,(2004) , 10.1089/109065704323016012
Robert C. Green, Jonathan S. Berg, Gerard T. Berry, Leslie G. Biesecker, David P. Dimmock, James P. Evans, Wayne W. Grody, Madhuri R. Hegde, Sarah Kalia, Bruce R. Korf, Ian Krantz, Amy L. McGuire, David T. Miller, Michael F. Murray, Robert L. Nussbaum, Sharon E. Plon, Heidi L. Rehm, Howard J. Jacob, Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing Genetics in Medicine. ,vol. 14, pp. 405- 410 ,(2012) , 10.1038/GIM.2012.21
Véronique De Gucht, Benjamin Fischler, Somatization: a critical review of conceptual and methodological issues. Psychosomatics. ,vol. 43, pp. 1- 9 ,(2002) , 10.1176/APPI.PSY.43.1.1
Chanita Hughes, Grace-Ann Fasaye, V.Holland LaSalle, Clinton Finch, Sociocultural influences on participation in genetic risk assessment and testing among African American women. Patient Education and Counseling. ,vol. 51, pp. 107- 114 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00179-9
James P. Evans, Barbra B. Rothschild, Return of results: not that complicated? Genetics in Medicine. ,vol. 14, pp. 358- 360 ,(2012) , 10.1038/GIM.2012.8
Catherine W Rehder, Karen L David, Betsy Hirsch, Helga V Toriello, Carolyn M Wilson, Hutton M Kearney, None, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics: standards and guidelines for documenting suspected consanguinity as an incidental finding of genomic testing. Genetics in Medicine. ,vol. 15, pp. 150- 152 ,(2013) , 10.1038/GIM.2012.169
Katrina Armstrong, Ellyn Micco, Amy Carney, Jill Stopfer, Mary Putt, Racial Differences in the Use of BRCA1/2 Testing Among Women With a Family History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer JAMA. ,vol. 293, pp. 1729- 1736 ,(2005) , 10.1001/JAMA.293.14.1729
Colin ME Halverson, Lainie Friedman Ross, Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results Journal of Community Genetics. ,vol. 3, pp. 275- 283 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S12687-012-0091-3
Michael J. Bamshad, Sarah B. Ng, Abigail W. Bigham, Holly K. Tabor, Mary J. Emond, Deborah A. Nickerson, Jay Shendure, Exome sequencing as a tool for Mendelian disease gene discovery Nature Reviews Genetics. ,vol. 12, pp. 745- 755 ,(2011) , 10.1038/NRG3031