What Is the Most Environmentally Beneficial Way to Treat Commercial Food Waste

作者: James W. Levis , Morton A. Barlaz

DOI: 10.1021/ES103556M

关键词:

摘要: Commercial food waste represents a relatively available high-quality feedstock for landfill diversion to biological treatment. A life-cycle assessment was performed commercial processed through aerobic composting systems of varying complexity, anaerobic digestion, and landfills with without gas collection energy recovery, as well bioreactor landfill. The functional unit 1000 kg plus 550 branches that are used bulking agent. For each alternative, global warming potential, NO(x) SO(2) emissions, total net use were determined. Anaerobic digestion the most environmentally beneficial treatment option, leading -395 CO(2)e per unit. This result driven by avoided electricity generation soil carbon storage from resulting amendment. alternatives led between -148 -64 CO(2)e, whereas emission -240 1100 CO(2)e. traditional recovery predicted have lower emissions than any when fertilizer offset used. There is variation in results based on uncertainty inputs, relative rankings dependent amendment compost peat has greater offsets value fertilizer.

参考文章(13)
B. Kiehl, T. R. Card, C. E. Schmidt, Composting trials evaluate VOC emissions control. Biocycle. ,vol. 50, pp. 33- 36 ,(2009)
Sven Lundie, Gregory M. Peters, LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF FOOD WASTE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 13, pp. 275- 286 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2004.02.020
Florentino B. De la Cruz, Morton A. Barlaz, Estimation of waste component-specific landfill decay rates using laboratory-scale decomposition data. Environmental Science & Technology. ,vol. 44, pp. 4722- 4728 ,(2010) , 10.1021/ES100240R
J.W. Levis, M.A. Barlaz, N.J. Themelis, P. Ulloa, Assessment of the state of food waste treatment in the United States and Canada. Waste Management. ,vol. 30, pp. 1486- 1494 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.WASMAN.2010.01.031
Anna W. Larsen, Marko Vrgoc, Thomas H. Christensen, Poul Lieberknecht, Diesel consumption in waste collection and transport and its environmental significance. Waste Management & Research. ,vol. 27, pp. 652- 659 ,(2009) , 10.1177/0734242X08097636
James W. Levis, Morton A. Barlaz, Is Biodegradability a Desirable Attribute for Discarded Solid Waste? Perspectives from a National Landfill Greenhouse Gas Inventory Model Environmental Science & Technology. ,vol. 45, pp. 5470- 5476 ,(2011) , 10.1021/ES200721S
Alessio Boldrin, Karin R. Hartling, Maria Laugen, Thomas H. Christensen, Environmental inventory modelling of the use of compost and peat in growth media preparation. Resources Conservation and Recycling. ,vol. 54, pp. 1250- 1260 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2010.04.003
William E. Eleazer, William S. Odle, Yu-Sheng Wang, Morton A. Barlaz, Biodegradability of Municipal Solid Waste Components in Laboratory-Scale Landfills Environmental Science & Technology. ,vol. 31, pp. 911- 917 ,(1997) , 10.1021/ES9606788
Alessio Boldrin, Jacob K. Andersen, Jacob Møller, Thomas H. Christensen, Enzo Favoino, Composting and compost utilization: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions. Waste Management & Research. ,vol. 27, pp. 800- 812 ,(2009) , 10.1177/0734242X09345275
Carol Diggelman, Robert K. Ham, Household food waste to wastewater or to solid waste? That is the question: Waste Management & Research. ,vol. 21, pp. 501- 514 ,(2003) , 10.1177/0734242X0302100603