Supercolonies, nests, and societies: distinguishing the forests from the trees

作者: M. W. Moffett

DOI: 10.1093/BEHECO/ARS042

关键词:

摘要: Moffett (this issue) defines supercolony as ‘‘a colony with a capacity to grow without bounds.’’ By this and many past definitions, even founding group of Argentine ant queens is ‘‘supercolony,’’ but the word used in practice only when colonies reach an exceptional size. Three commentators did not like suggestion employ after such populations over million individuals— admittedly arbitrary number. Still, no particular size has previously been specified, growth continuous seems follow same rules at every stage: I emphasize (Moffett, issue), use Pedersen’s phrase there ‘‘no tipping point’’ which ‘‘becomes’’ supercolony. Thus, always applied arbitrarily. Some experts describe Argentina’s smaller supercolonies,forinstance,whereasothers pointedlydo not.I suggested minimum about ants (‘‘well million’’ better wording: see glossary Moffett, because that largest population for species supercolonies, whether monodomous or polydomous—one interpretation ‘‘exceptionally large.’’ The intent provide guideline usage, require precise count ants. ‘‘Supercolony’’ can course continue be used, just arbitrarily inconsistently, any very large colony, albeit if it shows defining character, which, again, colony’s boundless under suitable conditions. First foremost, equivalently society: A social able distinguish reject conspecific outsiders issue). Lester Gordon (both instead characterize (societies) terms ‘‘functionality.’’ This, sharing resources reproduction(i.e.,bynestclumpslocally:Helleretal.2008).Even

参考文章(12)
J. Smallwood, Nest relocations in ants Insectes Sociaux. ,vol. 29, pp. 138- 147 ,(1982) , 10.1007/BF02228747
A. V. Suarez, D. A. Holway, T. J. Case, Patterns of spread in biological invasions dominated by long-distance jump dispersal: Insights from Argentine ants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 98, pp. 1095- 1100 ,(2001) , 10.1073/PNAS.98.3.1095
T. H. Roulston, G. Buczkowski, J. Silverman, Nestmate discrimination in ants: effect of bioassay on aggressive behavior Insectes Sociaux. ,vol. 50, pp. 151- 159 ,(2003) , 10.1007/S00040-003-0624-1
N. E. Heller, K. K. Ingram, D. M. Gordon, Nest connectivity and colony structure in unicolonial Argentine ants Insectes Sociaux. ,vol. 55, pp. 397- 403 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S00040-008-1019-0
David C. Queller, Joan E. Strassmann, KIN SELECTION AND SOCIAL INSECTS BioScience. ,vol. 48, pp. 165- 175 ,(1998) , 10.2307/1313262
J. S. Pedersen, The logic of hypersocial colonies Behavioral Ecology. ,vol. 23, pp. 934- 935 ,(2012) , 10.1093/BEHECO/ARS047
D. M. Gordon, N. E. Heller, Seeing the forest and the trees Behavioral Ecology. ,vol. 23, pp. 934- 934 ,(2012) , 10.1093/BEHECO/ARS046
P. J. Lester, M. A. M. Gruber, Comment on Moffett: "Supercolonies of billions in an invasive ant: What is a society?" Behavioral Ecology. ,vol. 23, pp. 935- 937 ,(2012) , 10.1093/BEHECO/ARS048
A. V. Suarez, E. L. Suhr, Ecological and evolutionary perspectives on "supercolonies": a commentary on Moffett Behavioral Ecology. ,vol. 23, pp. 937- 938 ,(2012) , 10.1093/BEHECO/ARS050
Mark W. Moffett, Supercolonies of billions in an invasive ant: What is a society? Behavioral Ecology. ,vol. 23, pp. 925- 933 ,(2012) , 10.1093/BEHECO/ARS043