Participant‐Reported Health Status Predicts Cardiovascular and All‐Cause Mortality Independent of Established and Nontraditional Biomarkers: Evidence From a Representative US Sample

作者: Steven D. Barger , Matthew R. Cribbet , Matthew F. Muldoon

DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003741

关键词:

摘要: Background Participant‐reported health status is a key indicator of cardiovascular health, but its predictive value relative to traditional and nontraditional risk factors unknown. We evaluated whether participant‐reported status, as indexed by self‐rated predicted disease, all‐cause mortality excess 10‐year atherosclerotic disease (ASCVD) scores 5 biomarkers. Methods Results Analyses used prospective observational data from the 1999–2002 National Health Nutrition Examination Surveys among those aged 40 79 years (N=4677). Vital was ascertained through 2011, during which there were 850 deaths, 206 (CVD). regressed CVD on standardized values in survival models, adjusting for age, sex, education, existing chronic race/ethnicity, ASCVD risk, biomarkers (fibrinogen, C‐reactive protein [CRP], triglycerides, albumin, uric acid). In sociodemographically adjusted 1‐SD decrease associated with increased (hazard ratio [HR], 1.92; 95% CI, 1.51–2.45; P <0.001), this hazard remained strong after (HR, 1.79; 1.42–2.26; <0.001). Self‐rated also even adjustment 1.50; 1.35–1.66; <0.001). Conclusions provides prognostic information beyond that captured assessments biomarkers. Consideration combination may facilitate assessment clinical care.

参考文章(44)
William Gould, Mario Cleves, Roberto Gutierrez, Yulia Marchenko, An introduction to survival analysis using Stata ,(2003)
Ioanna Tzoulaki, Konstantinos C. Siontis, Evangelos Evangelou, John P. A. Ioannidis, Bias in Associations of Emerging Biomarkers With Cardiovascular Disease JAMA Internal Medicine. ,vol. 173, pp. 664- 671 ,(2013) , 10.1001/JAMAINTERNMED.2013.3018
Robin Haring, You-Shan Feng, Jörn Moock, Henry Völzke, Marcus Dörr, Matthias Nauck, Henri Wallaschofski, Thomas Kohlmann, Self-perceived quality of life predicts mortality risk better than a multi-biomarker panel, but the combination of both does best BMC Medical Research Methodology. ,vol. 11, pp. 103- 103 ,(2011) , 10.1186/1471-2288-11-103
Steven M. Bradley, The Routine Clinical Capture of Patient-Reported Outcomes How Competition on Value Will Lead to Change Circulation-cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. ,vol. 7, pp. 635- 636 ,(2014) , 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001287
Yael Benyamini, Elaine A. Leventhal, Howard Leventhal, Self-assessments of health: What do people know that predicts their mortality? Research on Aging. ,vol. 21, pp. 477- 500 ,(1999) , 10.1177/0164027599213007
Ellen L. Idler, Yael Benyamini, Self-rated health and mortality : a review of twenty-seven community studies Journal of Health and Social Behavior. ,vol. 38, pp. 21- 37 ,(1997) , 10.2307/2955359
Steven D. Barger, Sarah M. Burke, Megan J. Limbert, Do induced moods really influence health perceptions Health Psychology. ,vol. 26, pp. 85- 95 ,(2007) , 10.1037/0278-6133.26.1.85
Marja Jylhä, Stefano Volpato, Jack M. Guralnik, Self-rated health showed a graded association with frequently used biomarkers in a large population sample Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 59, pp. 465- 471 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2005.12.004