End-digits preference for self-reported height depends on language

作者: Matthias Bopp , David Faeh

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-342

关键词:

摘要: When individuals report figures, they often prefer to round specific end-digits (e.g. zero). Such preference has been found in reports of body weight, cigarette consumption or blood pressure measurements. Very little is known about self-reported height. End-digit can distort estimates prevalence and other statistical parameters. This study examines end-digit for height how it relates with sex, age, educational level cultural affiliation. We analysed 47,192 (aged 15 years older) living Switzerland participating one the three population-based Swiss Health Surveys carried out 1992/93, 1997 2002 respectively. Digit preferences were by age group, level, survey, smoking status, interview language (only nationals) nationality. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) 95% confidence interval calculated using multivariate logistic regression. Italian French nationals (44.1% 40.6%) (39.6% 35.3%) more strongly preferred zero five than Germans German (29.2% 30.3%). Two, four, six eight popular (both 44.4%). Compared (OR = 1), five, OR 1.50 (1.38–1.63) 1.24 (1.18–1.30) Swiss; 1.73 (1.58–1.89) 1.61 (1.33–1.95) nationals. The two, showed an opposite pattern. Different depending on nationality could be observed consistently all national health surveys. patterns strikingly similar foreign speaking same language, suggesting that rather Taking into account rounding allow valid comparisons analyses data originating from different cultures.

参考文章(30)
M L Rowland, Self-reported weight and height. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. ,vol. 52, pp. 1125- 1133 ,(1990) , 10.1093/AJCN/52.6.1125
MARI PALTA, RONALD J PRINEAS, REUBEN BERMAN, PETER HANNAN, Comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight American Journal of Epidemiology. ,vol. 115, pp. 223- 230 ,(1982) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.AJE.A113294
Katherine M. Flegal, Penelope M. Keyl, F. Javier Nieto, Differential Misclassification Arising from Nondifferential Errors in Exposure Measurement American Journal of Epidemiology. ,vol. 134, pp. 1233- 1246 ,(1991) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.AJE.A116026
Li-Jian Li, Tong Liu, Pei-Shan Wang, None, Should we use digit preference as an indicator of quality control? Medical Hypotheses. ,vol. 65, pp. 192- 193 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.MEHY.2005.02.001
Vincent Wietlisbach, Fred Paccaud, Martin Rickenbach, Felix Gutzwiller, Trends in cardiovascular risk factors (1984-1993) in a Swiss region: results of three population surveys. Preventive Medicine. ,vol. 26, pp. 523- 533 ,(1997) , 10.1006/PMED.1997.0167
I Niedhammer, I Bugel, S Bonenfant, M Goldberg, A Leclerc, Validity of self-reported weight and height in the French GAZEL cohort. International Journal of Obesity. ,vol. 24, pp. 1111- 1118 ,(2000) , 10.1038/SJ.IJO.0801375
Robert C. Klesges, Margaret Debon, Joanne White Ray, ARE SELF-REPORTS OF SMOKING RATE BIASED? EVIDENCE FROM THE SECOND NATIONAL HEALTH AND NUTRITION EXAMINATION SURVEY Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 48, pp. 1225- 1233 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00020-5
MARIE FANELLI KUCZMARSKI, ROBERT J KUCZMARSKI, MATTHEW NAJJAR, Effects of Age on Validity of Self-Reported Height, Weight, and Body Mass Index Journal of the American Dietetic Association. ,vol. 101, pp. 28- 34 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00008-6
S. Connor Gorber, M. Tremblay, D. Moher, B. Gorber, A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review Obesity Reviews. ,vol. 8, pp. 307- 326 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1467-789X.2007.00347.X