Consensus by Committee: Philosophical and Social Aspects of Ethics Committees

作者: Jonathan D. Moreno

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-0860-7_11

关键词:

摘要: Until recently, the literature of biomedical ethics has not attended in analytical detail to nature consensus.1 This is curious if one considers that origins modern bioethics are closely tied episodes apparent consensus about use human subjects among scientific investigators, uses now regarded as wholly unacceptable. Rather, it been concept autonomy attracted most attention bioethics, perhaps antidote moral pitfalls consensus.

参考文章(20)
Charles Sanders Peirce, Philosophical Writings of Peirce ,(1955)
Julia T. Wood, Gerald M. Phillips, Emergent issues in human decision making Southern Illinois University Press. ,(1984)
Richard M. Fox, Joseph P. De Marco, New Directions in Ethics Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie. ,vol. 50, ,(1988)
Valdimer Orlando Key, Public Opinion And American Democracy ,(1961)
Helen Hall. Jennings, J. L. Moreno, Who Shall Survive ,(2007)
J. D. Arras, Getting down to cases: The revival of casuistry in bioethics Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. ,vol. 16, pp. 29- 51 ,(1991) , 10.1093/JMP/16.1.29
J. D. Moreno, Ethics by Committee: The Moral Authority of Consensus Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. ,vol. 13, pp. 411- 432 ,(1988) , 10.1093/JMP/13.4.411
K. Danner Clouser, A Critique of Principlism Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. ,vol. 15, pp. 219- 236 ,(1990) , 10.1093/JMP/15.2.219
Tom L. Beauchamp, James Franklin Childress, Principles of biomedical ethics ,(1979)
Stephen Toulmin, How Medicine Saved the Life of Ethics Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. ,vol. 25, pp. 736- 750 ,(1982) , 10.1353/PBM.1982.0064