WHAT IS MANAGERIAL MEDIOCRITY? Definition, Prevalence, and Negative Impact (Part 1)
作者： Evan M. Berman , Jonathan P. West
DOI: 10.1080/15309576.2003.11051796
关键词:
摘要: This study examines the extent and impact of mediocrity in management. Mediocrity among public managers is defined as having only a modest commitment to contemporary values practices administration. Based on national survey senior city governments with populations over 50,000, this finds that about 41% jurisdictions most have mediocre practices. Managerial shown strong, negative impacts workplace productivity citizen trust government. first two articles concludes practical tips for assessing workplace. The second article, which also issue PPMR, focuses strategies addressing managerial mediocrity.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(33)
Ronald C. Nyhan, Kuo-Tsai Liou, Dimensions of Organizational Commitment in the Public Sector: An Empirical Assessment Public Administration Quarterly. ,vol. 18, pp. 99- ,(1994)
Robert T. Golembiewski, Perspectives on Public-Sector OD, IX, Part 1: Conceptual and Empirical Emphases: A Symposium Public Administration Quarterly. ,vol. 23, pp. 133- ,(1999)
Linda Blessing, Raymon Bruce, John Blackman, Ted A. Gaebler, Positive Outcomes: Raising the Bar on Government Reinvention ,(1999)
Kenneth H. Ashworth, Caught Between the Dog and the Fireplug, or How to Survive Public Service ,(2001)
Sherman M. Wyman, Raymon Bruce, Changing Organizations: Practicing Action Training and Research ,(1998)
Margaret Pabst Battin, Peter C. Appleby, Peter Y. Windt, Ethical Issues in the Professions ,(1989)
Kathe Callahan, Marc Holzer, Government at Work: Best Practices and Model Programs ,(1997)
Christopher C. Hood, The Tools of Government ,(1983)
Peter Guy Northouse, Leadership : Theory and Practice ,(2015)
Elaine Bell, Back in fashion Nature Reviews Immunology. ,vol. 2, pp. 148- 149 ,(2002) , 10.1038/NRI752