作者: William S. Verplanck
DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-6494.1962.TB02311.X
关键词:
摘要: For some years now, problems of "leammg without awareness" have ansen m a number contexts, they created theoretical —and sometimes an expenmental—fuss Willy-mUy, those who mvestigate human operant behavior sooner or later are among mvolved, whether leaped, shpped, been dragged mto the fray These seem to be avenues by which participants enter scientific controversies, as well barroom brawls The courses development these two kmds controversy rather similar They show certam orderlmess. In both, dispute nses heat, and blows—or expenments—^get exchanged at higher rates, ongmal issue tends get lost, if there was one begm with present case, summarizes Itself "You can't," "I can," in progressively stronger inflections Just what can cannot done either has omitted, repeatedly redefined, extended itself It IS not surpnsmg that seemmgly contradictory results tum up To this wnter, dispute, seems somethmg do subject's abihty state expenmental contmgencies, is regrettable As it developed led performance expenments on mappropnate forms behavior, proliferation speculative theory By I mean been—by now— repeated over only mmor modifications confounded least questions, identification response^ classes stabihty (habituabihty) remforcers "Saymg plural nouns," "constructing sentences first person," "Mm-hmm," "Good"