Do SSH Researchers Have a Third Mission (And Should They Have)

作者: Brigida Blasi , Sandra Romagnosi , Andrea Bonaccorsi

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68554-0_16

关键词:

摘要: The notion of the third mission in SSH is still problematic, as well concept research impact. Several streams critical literature have raised concern that using or impact may limit academic freedom researchers, and reduce independence from market pressure impoverish SSH’s potential for thinking unorthodox visioning. However, countries which experienced selective cuts funding penalised disciplines, seen efforts to make hidden connections between society more visible. This chapter reports on debate controversies surrounding this issue. For first time, preliminary evidence Public Engagement activities scholars SSH, taken large-scale assessment Italian departments universities, presented. argues not only do a mission, but they are less engaged than their colleagues STEM disciplines.

参考文章(55)
Birge Wolf, Thomas Lindenthal, Manfred Szerencsits, J. Britt Holbrook, Jürgen Heß, Evaluating Research beyond Scientific ImpactHow to Include Criteria for Productive Interactions and Impact on Practice and Society GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society. ,vol. 22, pp. 104- 114 ,(2013) , 10.14512/GAIA.22.2.9
J Haskel, A Hughes, E Bascavusoglu-Moreau, The economic significance of the UK science base: a report for the Campaign for Science and Engineering Research Papers in Economics. ,(2014) , 10.25561/13751
Bruce Horner, Marc Bousquet, Tony Scott, Leo Parascondola, Tenured bosses and disposable teachers : writing instruction in the managed university College Composition and Communication. ,vol. 56, pp. 351- ,(2004) , 10.2307/4140657
Peter Brooks, Hilary Jewett, The Humanities and Public Life ,(2014)
Barbara Cassin, Appel des appels, Derrière les grilles : sortons du tout-évaluation Mille et une nuits. ,(2014)