A philosophical examination of coercion for mental health issues

摘要: This article considers two philosophical questions about coercion and mental disorders: (1) an analytical question, i.e., what is meant by the concept of coercion? (2) a normative justifies use The distinguishes between from other forms power such as inducement, persuasion, authority. It then range arguments for paternalistic benefit mentally disordered persons to restrain dangerous persons. This rests on assumption that there something be said academic division labour, empirical research in health law can conceptual clarification analysis arguments. In this I distinguish importantly different sorts we ask offer some answers those broad strokes.