Molecular paleobiological insights into the origin of the Brachiopoda

作者: Erik A. Sperling , Davide Pisani , Kevin J. Peterson

DOI: 10.1111/J.1525-142X.2011.00480.X

关键词:

摘要: Most studies of brachiopod evolution have been based on their extensive fossil record, but molecular techniques, due to independence from the rock can offer new insights into a clade. Previous phylogenetic hypotheses interrelationships place phoronids within brachiopods as sister group inarticulates, whereas morphological considerations suggest that Brachiopoda is monophyletic group. Here, these were tested with analysis seven nuclear housekeeping genes combined three ribosomal genes. The finds be monophyletic, relatively weak support, and craniid taxon all other brachiopods. Phylogenetic-signal dissection suggests support caused by instability craniid, which attracted phoronids. Analysis slowly evolving sites results in robustly supported Inarticulata (Linguliformea+Craniiformea), regarded most likely topology for interrelationships. monophyly was further microRNA-based phylogenetics, are small, noncoding RNA whose presence absence used infer relationships. Two novel microRNAs characterized supporting Congruence traditional analysis, microRNAs, cladograms Phoronida its Molecular clock extant Paleozoic divergence despite conservative morphology, early record robust, not affected taphonomic factors relating late-Precambrian/early-Cambrian phosphogenic event.

参考文章(79)
J. William Schopf, Cornelis Klein, The Proterozoic Biosphere ,(2011)
LE Holmer, LE Popov, MG Bassett, J Laurie, Phylogenetic analysis and ordinal classification of the Brachiopoda Palaeontology. ,vol. 38, pp. 713- 741 ,(1995)
Leonid Ye. Popov, The Cambrian Radiation of Brachiopods Topics in Geobiology. pp. 399- 423 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-1-4899-2427-8_12
D. T. J. Littlewood, Maximilian J. Telford, Animal evolution : genomes, fossils, and trees Oxford University Press. ,(2009)
K. J. Peterson, N. J. Butterfield, Origin of the Eumetazoa: Testing ecological predictions of molecular clocks against the Proterozoic fossil record Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 102, pp. 9547- 9552 ,(2005) , 10.1073/PNAS.0503660102
Ján Veizer, Davin Ala, Karem Azmy, Peter Bruckschen, Dieter Buhl, Frank Bruhn, Giles A.F. Carden, Andreas Diener, Stefan Ebneth, Yves Godderis, Torsten Jasper, Christoph Korte, Frank Pawellek, Olaf G. Podlaha, Harald Strauss, 87Sr/86Sr, δ13C and δ18O evolution of Phanerozoic seawater Chemical Geology. ,vol. 161, pp. 59- 88 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00081-9
The rise and fall of the Ediacaran biota Geological Society of London. ,vol. 286, ,(2007) , 10.1144/SP286
CARSTEN LUTER, THOMAS BARTOLOMAEUS, The phylogenetic position of Brachiopoda—a comparison of morphological and molecular data Zoologica Scripta. ,vol. 26, pp. 245- 253 ,(1997) , 10.1111/J.1463-6409.1997.TB00414.X
Bernhard Hausdorf, Martin Helmkampf, Maximilian P. Nesnidal, Iris Bruchhaus, Phylogenetic relationships within the lophophorate lineages (Ectoprocta, Brachiopoda and Phoronida). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. ,vol. 55, pp. 1121- 1127 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.YMPEV.2009.12.022