Screening for Prostate Cancer: Digital rectal examination: outdated or still valuable?

作者: Claartje Gosselaar

DOI:

关键词:

摘要: textabstractIntroduction and Objective: Digital rectal examination (DRE) is an important diagnostic tool of a urologist it has been incorporated in screening programmes for prostate cancer (PC), such as the European Randomized Study Screening Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). In Rotterdam section this study, until 1997, man with PSA level ≥4.0 ng/ml or abnormal result on DRE TRUS (transrectal ultrasound) was offered lateralised sextant biopsy. After 1997 however, were discontinued biopsy indication simultaneously threshold lowered to 3.0 ng/ml. While clearly not shown be valuable test early detection PC, value more controversial. study we summarise evidence position PSA-based screening. Methods First, assessed variability percentage positive between different physicians. Furthermore, evaluated additional effect chance men elevated PSA, differences characteristics tumours detected range 2.0-4.0 due cut-off, long-term having DRE. Finally, omitting from protocol analysed. Results A subject interobserver variability, varying 4% 28%. At very low (<4.0 ng/ml), poor PPV approximately 10%. A suspicious compared normal findings, addition increased finding at initial 22.4% 48.6%. This independent observer, but diminished subsequent rounds. ng/ml, selectively detects high-grade cancers when biopsying all men, still missed many these. On long-term, initially negative gives no worse outcomes regarding later. Omitting TRUS, while lowering resulted overall decrease 10% rate biopsies, remained similar 4.7%. relatively short-term follow-up, neither i! ncreased risk interval PC rounds. Conclusions At first used increases both detecting clinically significant disease. could therefore use optimise subgroups men. However, predictive setting, suitable solitary values.

参考文章(179)
K Knopf, R Merrill, O W Brawley, The epidemiology of prostate cancer. Part I : Descriptive epidemiology Seminars in Urologic Oncology. ,vol. 16, pp. 187- 192 ,(1998)
Deborah S. Smith, William J. Catalona, Rate of Change in Serum Prostate Specific Antigen Levels as a Method For Prostate Cancer Detection Journal of Urology. ,vol. 152, pp. 1163- 1167 ,(1994) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)32528-4
Bogdanowicz Jf, Bentvelsen Fm, Oosterom R, Schroeder Fh, Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen and prostatic acid phosphatase in untreated prostatic carcinoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology. ,vol. 138, pp. 97- 103 ,(1991)
B Djavan, M Marberger, A R Zlotta, B Bursa, M Remzi, C Seitz, S Hruby, C C Schulman, R Wolfram, Combination and multivariate analysis of PSA-based parameters for prostate cancer prediction. Techniques in urology. ,vol. 5, pp. 71- 76 ,(1999)
Gleason Df, Classification of prostatic carcinomas. Cancer chemotherapy reports. ,vol. 50, pp. 125- 128 ,(1966)
Bruce A. Lowe, Margaret B. Listrom, Incidental Carcinoma of the Prostate: An Analysis of the Predictors of Progression The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 140, pp. 1340- 1344 ,(1988) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)42039-8
Renske Postma, Fritz H. Schröder, Geert J.L.H. van Leenders, Robert F. Hoedemaeker, Andre N. Vis, Monique J. Roobol, Theodorus H. van der Kwast, Cancer detection and cancer characteristics in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC)--Section Rotterdam. A comparison of two rounds of screening. European Urology. ,vol. 52, pp. 89- 97 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.EURURO.2007.01.030
A.N. Vis, R. Kranse, M. Roobol, Th.H. Van Der Kwast, F.H. Schröder, Serendipity in detecting disease in low prostate-specific antigen ranges. BJUI. ,vol. 89, pp. 384- 389 ,(2002) , 10.1046/J.1464-4096.2001.01868.X
Scardino Pt, Early detection of prostate cancer. Urologic Clinics of North America. ,vol. 16, pp. 635- 655 ,(1989)
Stijn Roemeling, Monique J Roobol, Michael W Kattan, Theo H van der Kwast, Ewout W Steyerberg, Fritz H Schröder, None, Nomogram use for the prediction of indolent prostate cancer: impact on screen-detected populations. Cancer. ,vol. 110, pp. 2218- 2221 ,(2007) , 10.1002/CNCR.23029