Use of a Randomized Response Technique to obtain sensitive information on animal disease prevalence

作者: Paul Cross , Gareth Edwards-Jones , Hussain Omed , A. Prysor Williams

DOI: 10.1016/J.PREVETMED.2010.05.012

关键词:

摘要: In order for policy-makers to formulate effective disease control measures they require accurate estimates of the extent and prevalence disease. On occasion, obtaining these data can be difficult, as farmers may perceive relevant information being sensitive divulge. Consequently, underestimation occur due farmer reticence about admitting behaviours outcomes that are considered professionally transgressive. To overcome such weaknesses, this study used a novel social science survey method known Randomized Response Technique in obtain population level estimations transgressionary behavior case sheep scab Wales. Since deregulation 1992, has become widespread throughout UK. Previous UK have employed techniques which do not adequately protect anonymity farmers' answers other than via verbal or institution backed promise. study, at several agricultural shows Wales were asked complete questionnaires according during summer 2009. The results suggest 30% did routinely treat their scab. A further 36.5% surveyed admitted having flocks past 5 years. These both higher obtained by previous surveys more traditional questionnaire structures. Survey responses revealed strong willingness reintroduce compulsory treatment eradicate This is first demonstrate value context animal health.

参考文章(43)
Raymond M. Lee, Doing Research on Sensitive Topics ,(1993)
MARIANNE JUNGER, Discrepancies between police and self-report data for Dutch racial minorities British Journal of Criminology. ,vol. 29, pp. 273- 284 ,(1989) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.BJC.A047835
A. Keane, J. P. G. Jones, G. Edwards-Jones, E. J. Milner-Gulland, The sleeping policeman: understanding issues of enforcement and compliance in conservation Animal Conservation. ,vol. 11, pp. 75- 82 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1469-1795.2008.00170.X
Gerty J. L. M. Lensvelt-Mulders, Joop J. Hox, Peter G. M. van der Heijden, Cora J. M. Maas, Meta-Analysis of Randomized Response Research Thirty-Five Years of Validation Sociological Methods & Research. ,vol. 33, pp. 319- 348 ,(2005) , 10.1177/0049124104268664
Rebeca de Souza e Silva, Elisabeth Meloni Vieira, Frequency and characteristics of induced abortion among married and single women in São Paulo, Brazil Cadernos De Saude Publica. ,vol. 25, pp. 179- 187 ,(2009) , 10.1590/S0102-311X2009000100019
Chris Lewis, Update on sheep scab in Practice. ,vol. 19, pp. 558- 564 ,(1997) , 10.1136/INPRACT.19.10.558
Simon Carpenter, Kyriaki Nomikou, None, Communication of bluetongue mitigation techniques Veterinary Record. ,vol. 165, pp. 636- 636 ,(2009) , 10.1136/VR.165.21.636
N. Sargison, K. Dun, D. Taylor, Sheep scab control in UK flocks Veterinary Record. ,vol. 158, pp. 309- 309 ,(2006) , 10.1136/VR.158.9.309
Gerty J. L. M. Lensvelt-Mulders, Joop J. Hox, Peter G. M. van der Heijden, How to Improve the Efficiency of Randomised Response Designs Quality & Quantity. ,vol. 39, pp. 253- 265 ,(2005) , 10.1007/S11135-004-0432-3
Neil Sargison, David Taylor, Kath Dun, Regional control of sheep scab in UK flocks In Practice. ,vol. 28, pp. 62- 69 ,(2006) , 10.1136/INPRACT.28.2.62