Moving Between Argumentation Frameworks

作者: Nir Oren , Michael Luck , Chris Reed

DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-379

关键词:

摘要: Abstract argument frameworks have been used for various applications within multi-agent systems, including reasoning and negotiation. Different make use of different inter-argument relations semantics to identify some subset arguments as coherent, yet there is no easy way map between these frameworks; most commonly, this done manually according human intuition. In response, in paper, we show how a set described using Dung's or Nielsen's can be mapped from an framework that includes both attack support relations. This mapping preserves the framework's sense deemed coherent one other under related semantics. Interestingly, translation not unique, with based multiple sets only framework. Additionally, EAF into interchange format (AIF). By mapping, any AIF translated DAF while preserving its

参考文章(14)
Leila Amgoud, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex, Claudette Cayrol, On the bipolarity in argumentation frameworks. non-monotonic reasoning. pp. 1- 9 ,(2004)
Claudette Cayrol, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex, Bipolar abstract argumentation systems Applied Artificial Intelligence. pp. 65- 84 ,(2009) , 10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_4
Sanjay Modgil, An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences european conference on symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning and uncertainty. pp. 648- 659 ,(2007) , 10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_57
Leila Amgoud, Claudette Cayrol, Integrating Preference Orderings into Argument-Based Reasoning conference on automated deduction. pp. 159- 170 ,(1997) , 10.1007/BFB0035620
Søren Holbech Nielsen, Simon Parsons, A Generalization of Dung’s Abstract Framework for Argumentation: Arguing with Sets of Attacking Arguments Lecture Notes in Computer Science. pp. 54- 73 ,(2006) , 10.1007/978-3-540-75526-5_4
Diego C. Martínez, Alejandro J. García, Guillermo R. Simari, Progressive Defeat Paths in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks Advances in Artificial Intelligence. pp. 242- 253 ,(2006) , 10.1007/11766247_21
C. Cayrol, M. C. Lagasquie-Schiex, On the Acceptability of Arguments in Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks Lecture Notes in Computer Science. pp. 378- 389 ,(2005) , 10.1007/11518655_33
Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Value Based Argumentation Frameworks non-monotonic reasoning. pp. 443- 454 ,(2002)
Nir Oren, Timothy J. Norman, Semantics for Evidence-Based Argumentation computational models of argument. pp. 276- 284 ,(2008)
Sanjay Modgil, Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks Artificial Intelligence. ,vol. 173, pp. 901- 934 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.ARTINT.2009.02.001