Alveolar bone tissue engineering in critical‐size defects of experimental animal models: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

作者: Siddharth Shanbhag , Nikolaos Pandis , Kamal Mustafa , Jens R. Nyengaard , Andreas Stavropoulos

DOI: 10.1002/TERM.2198

关键词:

摘要: Regeneration of large, 'critical-size' bone defects remains a clinical challenge. Bone tissue engineering (BTE) is emerging as promising alternative to autogenous, allogeneic and biomaterial-based grafting. The objective this systematic review was answer the focused question: in animal models, do cell-based BTE strategies enhance regeneration alveolar critical-size (CSDs), compared with grafting only biomaterial scaffolds or autogenous bone? Following PRISMA guidelines, electronic databases were searched for controlled studies reporting maxillary mandibular CSD implantation mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) osteoblasts (OBs) seeded on scaffolds. A random effects meta-analysis performed outcome histomorphometric new formation (%NBF). Thirty-six included that reported large- (monkeys, dogs, sheep, minipigs) small-animal (rabbits, rats) models. On average, presented an unclear-to-high risk bias short observation times. In most studies, MSCs OBs used combination alloplastic mineral-phase five modified by ex vivo gene transfer morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). indicated statistically significant benefits favour of: (1) cell-loaded vs. cell-free [weighted mean difference (WMD) 15.59-49.15% 8.60-13.85% NBF respectively]; (2) BMP-gene-modified unmodified (WMD 10.06-20.83% models). Results inconclusive. Overall, heterogeneity high (I2  > 90%). summary, enhanced addition osteogenic direction estimates treatment effect are useful predict therapeutic efficacy guide future trials BTE. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

参考文章(107)
Maria R Moalli, Edwin Berryman, Cedo M Bagi, Comparative Bone Anatomy of Commonly Used Laboratory Animals: Implications for Drug Discovery Comparative Medicine. ,vol. 61, pp. 76- 85 ,(2011)
Julian PT Higgins, Jonathan J Deeks, Douglas G Altman, Special Topics in Statistics John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 481- 529 ,(2008) , 10.1002/9780470712184.CH16
Julian PT Higgins, Jonathan J Deeks, Selecting Studies and Collecting Data John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 151- 185 ,(2008) , 10.1002/9780470712184.CH7
Jonathan AC Sterne, Matthias Egger, David Moher, Addressing Reporting Biases John Wiley and Sons, Inc. pp. 297- 333 ,(2008) , 10.1002/9780470712184.CH10
Yun Liao, Xiao-Long Zhang, Ling Li, Fu-Ming Shen, Ming-Kang Zhong, Stem cell therapy for bone repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies with large animal models British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. ,vol. 78, pp. 718- 726 ,(2014) , 10.1111/BCP.12382
Marissa C. Stewart, Lara E. McCormick, Jesse R. Goliath, Paul W. Sciulli, Sam D. Stout, A comparison of histomorphometric data collection methods. Journal of Forensic Sciences. ,vol. 58, pp. 109- 113 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.1556-4029.2012.02195.X
Sang-Hyun Park, HyunMin Choi, Jin-Soo Han, Young-Bum Park, Comparative study of decalcification versus nondecalcification for histological evaluation of one-wall periodontal intrabony defects in dogs. Microscopy Research and Technique. ,vol. 78, pp. 94- 104 ,(2015) , 10.1002/JEMT.22449
Jonathan J Deeks, Julian PT Higgins, Douglas G Altman, Cochrane Statistical Methods Group, None, Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. pp. 243- 296 ,(2019) , 10.1002/9780470712184.CH9
Siddharth Shanbhag, Vivek Shanbhag, Clinical Applications of Cell‐Based Approaches in Alveolar Bone Augmentation: A Systematic Review Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. ,vol. 17, ,(2015) , 10.1111/CID.12103
Carolin Götz, Patrick H. Warnke, Andreas Kolk, Current and future options of regeneration methods and reconstructive surgery of the facial skeleton. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, and Oral Radiology. ,vol. 120, pp. 315- 323 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.OOOO.2015.05.022