Concentration of bacteria passing through puncture holes in surgical gloves

作者: Julian-Camill Harnoß , Lars-Ivo Partecke , Claus-Dieter Heidecke , Nils-Olaf Hübner , Axel Kramer

DOI: 10.1016/J.AJIC.2009.06.013

关键词:

摘要: Background The reasons for gloving-up surgery are to protect the surgical field from microorganisms on surgeon's hands and surgeon patient's microorganisms. This study measured concentration of bacteria passing through glove punctures under conditions. Methods Double-layered gloves were worn during visceral surgeries over a 4-month period. included 128 outer 122 inner 20 septic laparotomies. To measure bacterial passage though punctures, intraoperative swabs made, yielding that compared with retrieved layer using modified Gaschen bag method. Results Depending duration wear, microperforation rate averaged 15%. Approximately 82% perforations went unnoticed by team. Some 86% occurred in nondominant hand, index finger being most frequently punctured location (36%). Bacterial site was detected 4.7% investigated gloves. Conclusion develop microperforations not immediately recognized staff. During surgery, such allow punctures. Possible strategies preventing include strengthening areas prone strict changing every 90 minutes.

参考文章(26)
Lateef O A Thanni, W Yinusa, Incidence of glove failure during orthopedic operations and the protective effect of double gloves. Journal of The National Medical Association. ,vol. 95, pp. 1184- 1188 ,(2003)
Maria Gańczak, Andrzej Bohatyrewicz, Piotr Białecki, Double gloving in reducing the interoperative risk of blood borne pathogens Chirurgia narzadów ruchu i ortopedia polska. ,vol. 69, pp. 249- ,(2004)
Wan Ariffin Bin Abdullah, Med J Malaysia ,(2001)
Judith Tanner, Hazel Parkinson, Double gloving to reduce surgical cross‐infection Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 99, pp. 58- 58 ,(2006) , 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.PUB2
K.P. O'Connell, M. El-Masri, J.B. Broyles, D.M. Korniewicz, Testing for viral penetration of non-latex surgical and examination gloves: a comparison of three methods Clinical Microbiology and Infection. ,vol. 10, pp. 322- 326 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1198-743X.2004.00848.X
S. D. Eckford, M. James, S. R. Jackson, A. J. Hamer, J. J. Browning, Detection of glove puncture and skin contamination during caesarean section British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. ,vol. 104, pp. 1209- 1211 ,(1997) , 10.1111/J.1471-0528.1997.TB10950.X
Jean-Louis Caillot, Philippe Paparel, Eric Arnal, Vincent Schreiber, Eric J. Voiglio, Anticipated detection of imminent surgeon-patient barrier breaches. A prospective randomized controlled trial using an indicator underglove system. World Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 30, pp. 134- 138 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S00268-005-0172-0
S. Marín-Bertolín, R. González-Martínez, Neira C. Giménez, Marquina P. Vila, J. Amorrortu-Velayos, Does Double Gloving Protect Surgical Staff from Skin Contamination during Plastic Surgery? Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. ,vol. 99, pp. 956- 960 ,(1997) , 10.1097/00006534-199704000-00003
R.P. Cole, D.T. Gault, Glove perforation during plastic surgery. British Journal of Plastic Surgery. ,vol. 42, pp. 481- 483 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0007-1226(89)90019-2