Grazing in a porous environment. 2. Nematode community structure

作者: Deborah A. Neher , Thomas R. Weicht , Mary Savin , Josef H. Görres , José A. Amador

DOI: 10.1023/A:1004665120360

关键词:

摘要: The influence of soil matric potential on nematode community composition and grazing associations were examined. Undisturbed cores (5 cm diameter, 10 depth) collected in an old field dominated by perennial grasses a Hinckley sandy loam at Peckham Farm near Kingston, Rhode Island. Ten pairs incubated −3, −10, −20 −50 kPa after saturation for 21–28 or 42–58 days. Nematodes extracted using Cobb's decanting sieving method followed sucrose centrifugal-flotation identified to family genus. Collembola enchytraeids present also enumerated because they are grazers that reside air-filled spaces. Direct counts bacteria fungi made estimate biovolume fluorescein isothiocyanate diacetate stains, respectively. Trophic diversity maturity indices calculated communities. Three patterns effect observed taxa. One, there was consistent all seasons Alaimus, Monhysteridae, Prismatolaimus, Paraxonchium Dorylaimoides. Two, some effects among other inconsistent Aphelenchoides, Aphelenchus, Cephalobidae, Coomansus, Eudorylaimus, Huntaphelenchoides, Panagrolaimidae, Paraphelenchus, Sectonema, Tripyla. Third, always Aphanolaimus, Aporcelaimellus, Bunonema, Rhabditidae, Tylencholaimus. As predicted, fungal bacterial biomass responded oppositely potential. Total greater −3 than (P=0.0095). −50, −10 Neither bacterial-feeding, fungal-feeding nor predacious nematodes correlated significantly with biomass. Omnivorous positively number bacterial-feeding nematodes; nematodes. Numbers more often microbial-grazing numbers drier moist soils. From this study, we propose two mechanisms may explain structure changes potential: differential anhydrobiosis and/or enclosure hypotheses. later suggests drying generates pockets moisture aggregates become isolated from one another enclosing their food relatively high concentrations creating patches activity separated larger areas inactivity.

参考文章(50)
A.M.T. Bongers, De nematoden van Nederland. Stichting Uitgeverij Koninklijke Nederlandse Natuurhistorische Vereniging. ,(1988)
R. Lal, D. A. Crossley, R. H. Miller, P. Madden, C. A. Edwards, G. House, J. M. Blair, D. C. Coleman, P. F. Hendrix, Soil biota as compounds of sustainable agroecosystems. Sustainable agricultural systems.. pp. 637- 654 ,(1990)
William R. Nickle, Manual of agricultural nematology Manual of Agricultural Nematology. pp. 1035- ,(1991)
Christien H. Ettema, Soil nematode diversity: species coexistence and ecosystem function. Journal of Nematology. ,vol. 30, pp. 159- 169 ,(1998)
D. J. Hunt, Aphelenchida, Longidoridae and Trichodoridae: their systematics and bionomics. Aphelenchida, Longidoridae and Trichodoridae: their systematics and bionomics.. ,(1993)
D. T. Kaplan, D. W. Freckman, S. D. Van Gundy, A comparison of techniques for extraction and study of anhydrobiotic nematodes from dry soils. Journal of Nematology. ,vol. 9, pp. 176- 181 ,(1977)
G.W. Yeates, T. Bongers, R.G.M. de Goede, G.W. Korthals, Proposed changes of c-p classification for nematodes. Russian Journal of Nematology. ,vol. 3, pp. 61- 62 ,(1995)
A.J. Thomasson, F.G.W. Jones, Bulk-density as an indicator of pore space in soils usable by nematodes Nematologica. ,vol. 22, pp. 133- 137 ,(1976) , 10.1163/187529276X00201
J.M. Anderson, Invertebrate-mediated transport processes in soils Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. ,vol. 24, pp. 5- 19 ,(1988) , 10.1016/0167-8809(88)90052-7