Clinical predictors of Gleason score upgrading: implications for patients considering watchful waiting, active surveillance, or brachytherapy.

作者: Girish S. Kulkarni , Gina Lockwood , Andrew Evans , Ants Toi , John Trachtenberg

DOI: 10.1002/CNCR.22712

关键词:

摘要: BACKGROUND Brachytherapy, active surveillance, and watchful waiting are increasingly being offered to men with low-risk prostate cancer. However, many of these harbor undetected high-grade disease (Gleason pattern ≥4). The ability identify those individuals occult may help guide treatment decisions in this patient cohort. METHODS The authors identified 175 cases cancer treated radical prostatectomy. By using logistic regression analysis, 11 a priori-defined preoperative risk factors were evaluated for their predict upgrading from Gleason 6 at biopsy ≥7 An internally validated nomogram all clinical variables was subsequently created physicians patients who had disease. RESULTS A total 60 (34%) upgraded disease. On multivariate analyses, both prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (P = .02) the pathologist expertise .007) predictive upgrading. contained plus age, digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound results, scheme applied (sextant vs extended), presence prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, gland volume, percentage biopsy. provided acceptable discrimination (C statistic 0.71). CONCLUSIONS The significant predictors diagnosed A based on study findings could further risk-stratify before embarking treatment. Caution should be exercised recommending nonradical therapy high probability Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Society.

参考文章(23)
Stanley Lemeshow, David W. Hosmer, Applied Logistic Regression ,(1989)
William C. Allsbrook, Kathy A. Mangold, Maribeth H. Johnson, Roger B. Lane, Cynthia G. Lane, Jonathan I. Epstein, Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist. Human Pathology. ,vol. 32, pp. 81- 88 ,(2001) , 10.1053/HUPA.2001.21135
FELIX K.-H. CHUN, ALBERTO BRIGANTI, SHAhROKH F. SHARIAT, MARKUS GRAEFEN, FRANCESCO MONTORSI, ANDREAS ERBERSDOBLER, THOMAS STEUBER, ANDREA SALONIA, EIKE CURRLIN, VINCENZO SCATTONI, MARTIN G. FRIEDRICH, THORSTEN SCHLOMM, ALEXANDER HAESE, UWE MICHL, RENZO COLOMBO, HANS HEINZER, LUC VALIQUETTE, PATRIZIO RIGATTI, CLAUS G. ROEHRBORN, HARTWIG HULAND, PIERRE I. KARAKIEWICZ, Significant upgrading affects a third of men diagnosed with prostate cancer: predictive nomogram and internal validation BJUI. ,vol. 98, pp. 329- 334 ,(2006) , 10.1111/J.1464-410X.2006.06262.X
Donald F. Gleason, Histologic grading of prostate cancer: A perspective Human Pathology. ,vol. 23, pp. 273- 279 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0046-8177(92)90108-F
Takashi Fukagai, Thomas Namiki, Hideo Namiki, Robert G. Carlile, Makoto Shimada, Hideki Yoshida, Discrepancies between Gleason scores of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens Pathology International. ,vol. 51, pp. 364- 370 ,(2001) , 10.1046/J.1440-1827.2001.01207.X
Ewout W. Steyerberg, Marinus J. C. Eijkemans, Frank E. Harrell, J. Dik F. Habbema, Prognostic modeling with logistic regression analysis: in search of a sensible strategy in small data sets. Medical Decision Making. ,vol. 21, pp. 45- 56 ,(2001) , 10.1177/0272989X0102100106
Christopher R. King, John E. McNeal, Harcharan Gill, Joseph C. Presti, Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 59, pp. 386- 391 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.IJROBP.2003.10.014
Christopher R. King, Deep A. Patel, Martha K. Terris, Prostate biopsy volume indices do not predict for significant Gleason upgrading. American Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 28, pp. 125- 129 ,(2005) , 10.1097/01.COC.0000143848.24158.C3
Anthony V D’Amico, Andrew A Renshaw, Leisa Arsenault, Delray Schultz, Jerome P Richie, Clinical predictors of upgrading to Gleason grade 4 or 5 disease at radical prostatectomy: potential implications for patient selection for radiation and androgen suppression therapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 45, pp. 841- 846 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00260-6