Effect of specimen gripping device, geometry and fixation method on microtensile bond strength, failure mode and stress distribution: laboratory and finite element analyses.

作者: Luís H.A. Raposo , Steven R. Armstrong , Rodrigo R. Maia , Fang Qian , Saulo Geraldeli

DOI: 10.1016/J.DENTAL.2012.02.010

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Objectives Innumerous modifications have been proposed for the microtensile test since its introduction; however, testing parameters are not often well described and wide variations in bond strength commonly reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate effect specimen's gripping device, specimen geometry fixation method on strength, failure mode, stress distribution when using an etch-and-rinse 2-step adhesive system bonded human dentin. Methods Resin-based composite occlusal dentin from 21 molars used fabricate dumbbell- stick-shaped specimens which were divided into three groups: Di – dumbbell-specimens placed a Dircks device; GeS stick-specimens gripped Geraldeli's device with Superglue; GeZ Zapit. Specimens tested tensile mode examined under stereomicroscopy fracture initiation sites verified by scanning electron microscopy energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Three-dimensional models each device/specimen created finite element calculations performed. Results devices significant, unless areas normalized. influenced type device. less sensitive error than Geraldeli's, produced more uniform at dumbbell layer did stick layer. Significance Microtensile can directly influence results consequently inter-study comparisons.

参考文章(53)
Masahiro Yoshiyama, Hidehiko Sano, Ricardo M. Carvalho, Carlos A. Fernandes, David H. Pashley, Masatoshi Nakajima, Yasuo Shono, Franklin Tay, The microtensile bond test: a review. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. ,vol. 1, pp. 299- 309 ,(1999)
Josete Barbosa Cruz Meira, Larissa Driemeier, Rafael Yague Ballester, Roberto Martins de Souza, Stress concentration in microtensile tests using uniform material. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. ,vol. 6, pp. 267- 273 ,(2004)
Betamar N, Cardew G, Van Noort R, The effect of variations in hourglass specimen design on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. ,vol. 9, pp. 427- ,(2007)
Sano H, Tagami J, Pereira Pn, Nakajima M, Zheng L, Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Operative Dentistry. ,vol. 26, pp. 97- 104 ,(2001)
Mario Fernando De Goes, Daniel C.N. Chan, Steven K. Nelson, David Henry Pashley, Cindy T. Jones, Microtensile bond strength testing and failure analysis of hybrid and flowable composites. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. ,vol. 8, pp. 13- 20 ,(2006)
L. H. A. Raposo, G. R. Silva, P. C. F. Santos-Filho, P. V. Soares, P. B. F. Soares, P. C. Simamoto-Junior, A. J. Fernandes-Neto, C. J. Soares, Effect of anti-rotation devices on biomechanical behaviour of teeth restored with cast post-and-cores. International Endodontic Journal. ,vol. 43, pp. 681- 691 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1365-2591.2010.01739.X
A.A. El Zohairy, A.J. de Gee, N. de Jager, L.J. van Ruijven, A.J. Feilzer, The Influence of Specimen Attachment and Dimension on Microtensile Strength Journal of Dental Research. ,vol. 83, pp. 420- 424 ,(2004) , 10.1177/154405910408300513
Carlos J Soares, Fernanda R Santana, Carolina G Castro, Paulo CF Santos-Filho, Paulo V Soares, Fang Qian, Steven R Armstrong, None, Finite element analysis and bond strength of a glass post to intraradicular dentin: comparison between microtensile and push-out tests. Dental Materials. ,vol. 24, pp. 1405- 1411 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.DENTAL.2008.03.004
Alvaro Della Bona, Kenneth J Anusavice, John J Mecholsky Jr, Failure analysis of resin composite bonded to ceramic. Dental Materials. ,vol. 19, pp. 693- 699 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00015-0
André Poitevin, Jan De Munck, Kirsten Van Landuyt, Eduardo Coutinho, Marleen Peumans, Paul Lambrechts, Bart Van Meerbeek, Influence of three specimen fixation modes on the micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives to dentin. Dental Materials Journal. ,vol. 26, pp. 694- 699 ,(2007) , 10.4012/DMJ.26.694