Willingness to use microbicides varies by race/ethnicity, experience with prevention products, and partner type.

作者: Kathleen M. Morrow , Joseph L. Fava , Rochelle K. Rosen , Anna L. Christensen , Sara Vargas

DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.6.777

关键词:

摘要: Globally, approximately half of all new HIV infections occur in women and the proportion newly infected is increasing (Ogden, Ogden, Mthembu, & Williamson, 2004; UNAIDS/WHO, 2005). According to Centers for Disease Control Prevention [CDC], represent 30% United States (U.S.) each year, three-quarters which are transmitted via heterosexual intercourse (Centers Among sexually active women, a woman's risk infection often related behaviors beyond her direct control, such as sex- or drug-related behavior sexual partner (Hader, Smith, Moore, Holmberg, 2001). Given rise becoming with annually limited ability exercise condom use their male partners (Beksinska, Rees, McIntyre, Wilkinson, 2001; Parker, Easton, Klein, 2000; Sapire, 1995; 2003; World Health Organization [WHO], 1997; Wingood DiClemente, 1998), need woman-initiated prevention option profound. Topical vaginal microbicides offer best hope protecting from HIV/AIDS. The term “microbicide” applies range products that, when applied topically vagina prior intercourse, could prevent significantly reduce transmission; some may also provide protection against other STDs, still others have contraceptive effects (Alliance Microbicide Development, Global Campaign Microbicides, 2006; International Partnership Several candidate now undergoing clinical efficacy trials. In preparation FDA approval microbicides, behavioral social scientists been exploring psychosocial factors hypothesized be associated acceptability continued these products. It will critical successful uptake products, thus impact on rates transmission, understand who would why. For instance, product vary by type number, cultural influences context, (Severy, Tolley, Woodsong, Guest, 2005)? Given greater understanding affect microbicide use, scientists, well health care providers systems, better able develop target appropriate interventions. Phoenix Project was designed gather formative data psychometrically evaluate measures. Several models, including theories reasoned action planned behavior, posit that intention, “subjective probability” one perform given (Fishbein Ajzen, 1975), can predict eventual behavior. In meta-analysis (Sheeran Orbell, medium strong correlation found between intentions though degree relationship has affected gender et al., von Haeften, Fishbein, Kaspryzk, Montano, 2000). Thus, while studies significant measures intention safer sex (Albarracin, Johnson, Muellerleile, Basen-Engquist, 1992; Basen-Engquist Parcel, Bryan, Rocheleau, Robbins, Hutchinson, 2005; Fishbein Fisher, Rye, Godin, Gagnon, Lambert, Posner, Bull, Ortiz, Evans, Roberts Kennedy, Sheeran, Abraham, 1999), less evidence (Minnis, Shiboski, Padian, Rosenthal, Fernbach, 1997). It possible way construct measured contribute than consistent results. colleagues (1975) discussed specificity items relating (i.e., object, situation, time). Within realm self-efficacy, Bandura (1985) Forsyth Carey (1998) posited self-efficacy include specific class context circumstance. Studies used varying levels (Albarracin Hennessy, Yzer, Douglas, 2003), (Smith, McGraw, Costa, McKinlay, 1996). Gibbons postulated distinct constructs willingness, expectation should considered predicting outcomes. While, at face value, measuring appear very similar, Gibbons them prediction both together independently. These results ongoing discussion how contextualize measurement led willingness microbicide, specifying partner, type, episode certain characteristics accessibility referents. Willingness chosen because hypothetical nature contrast expectation, imply an actual plan goal, environment where proof concept and, therefore, readily available product, does not currently exist. Thus likelihood using under circumstances, approximated current status development. As part larger effort set upcoming studies, gathered elucidate themes developed quantitative measure those constructs, tested resulting measures. With respect analysis, “willingness microbicides” evaluated. scale then further analyses explore demographic variables microbicides. In case circumstances future use. Hence, ultimately sustained product. Our model assumes product-related factors, person-related microbicide.

参考文章(64)
M E Beksinska, J A Mcintyre, D Wilkinson, V H Rees, Acceptability of the female condom in different groups of women in South Africa--a multicentred study to inform the national female condom introductory strategy. South African Medical Journal. ,vol. 91, pp. 672- 678 ,(2001)
J B McKinlay, K W Smith, S A McGraw, L A Costa, A self-efficacy scale for HIV risk behaviors: development and evaluation. Aids Education and Prevention. ,vol. 8, pp. 97- 105 ,(1996)
Anne Young, The female condom : a review World Health Organization. ,(1997)
Gaston Godin, Hélène Gagnon, Léo-Daniel Lambert, Factors associated with maintenance of regular condom use among single heterosexual adults: a longitudinal study. Canadian Journal of Public Health-revue Canadienne De Sante Publique. ,vol. 94, pp. 287- 291 ,(2003) , 10.17269/CJPH.94.345
Janet S. St. Lawrence, Gloria D. Eldridge, David Reitman, Connie E. Little, Millicent C. Shelby, Ted L. Brasfield, Factors influencing condom use among African-American women: implications for risk reduction interventions. American Journal of Community Psychology. ,vol. 26, pp. 7- 28 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1021877906707
Gina M. Wingood, Ralph J. DiClemente, Partner Influences and Gender-Related Factors Associated with Noncondom Use Among Young Adult African American Women American Journal of Community Psychology. ,vol. 26, pp. 29- 51 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1021830023545
Karen Basen-Engquist, Guy S. Parcel, Attitudes, Norms, and Self-Efficacy: A Model of Adolescents' HIV-Related Sexual Risk Behavior: Health Education & Behavior. ,vol. 19, pp. 263- 277 ,(1992) , 10.1177/109019819201900209
Richard G. Parker, Delia Easton, Charles H. Klein, Structural Barriers and Facilitators in HIV Prevention: A Review of International Research AIDS. ,vol. 14, pp. 17- 46 ,(2000) , 10.1097/00002030-200006001-00004
Johanna E. Soet, Colleen Dilorio, William N. Dudley, Women's Self-Reported Condom Use: Intra and Interpersonal Factors Women & Health. ,vol. 27, pp. 19- 32 ,(1998) , 10.1300/J013V27N04_02
Michael D. Stein, Jennifer G. Clarke, Cynthia Rosengard, Megan Hebert, Kristen DaSilva, Jennifer Rose, Correlates of Partner‐Specific Condom Use Intentions Among Incarcerated Women in Rhode Island Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. ,vol. 37, pp. 32- 38 ,(2005) , 10.1363/373205