Totalitarianism and justice: Hannah Arendt's and Judith N. Shklar’s political reflections in historical and theoretical perspective

作者: Samantha Ashenden , Andreas Hess

DOI: 10.1080/03085147.2016.1224142

关键词:

摘要: AbstractWe locate Arendt’s and Shklar’s writings within what Katznelson has identified as an attempt to create a new language for politics after the cataclysm of twentieth century, Greif called ‘maieutic’ discourse ‘re-enlightenment’ in ‘age crisis man’. More specifically, we compare contrast two related, but many ways also differing, thinking about totalitarianism its legal repercussions. To this end, examine sets studies: The origins Eichmann Jerusalem: A report on banality evil After utopia: decline political faith Legalism: An essay law, morals, politics. While utopia discussed totalitarian ideology consequences modern thought, Legalism dealt with question whether how justice is possible extreme experience totalitarianism. We argue that maieutic impuls...

参考文章(28)
Andreas Hess, Shklar, Judith N (1928–92) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition). pp. 889- 895 ,(2015) , 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.61285-0
Hannah Arendt, Jerome Kohn, Responsibility and Judgment ,(2003)
Judith N. Shklar, Stanley Hoffmann, Political Thought and Political Thinkers ,(1998)
Judith N. Shklar, The Faces of Injustice ,(1992)
Martin Loughlin, Neil Walker, The Paradox of Constitutionalism Oxford University Press. ,(2008) , 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199552207.001.0001
Bernhard Giesen, Triumph and Trauma ,(2004)