Communication infrastructure for concurrent engineering

作者: Daniel R. Kuokka , Larry T. Harada

DOI: 10.1017/S0890060400002833

关键词:

摘要: Integrating multiple engineering perspectives is critical to designing ever more complex products, but this introduces great potential for miscommunication leading design conflicts. The SHADE (SHAred Dependency Engineering) project defining agent infrastructure technology that supports dynamic, knowledge-based communication among heterogeneous tools, collaboration systems, and conflict management systems. Building on technologies a shared formal vocabulary protocols exchanging information, developing facilitators assist in locating disseminating information. result flexible helps existing tools work together effectively, variety of new approaches. This article outlines the facilitation application agents created by SHADE, provides an in-depth example their task.

参考文章(14)
Daniel Kuokka, Larry Harada, Matchmaking for information agents international joint conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 672- 678 ,(1995)
Katia P. Sycara, Argumentation: planning other agents' plans international joint conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 517- 523 ,(1989)
Daniel R. Kuokka, The deliberative integration of planning, execution, and learning Carnegie Mellon University. ,(1990)
C. Petrie, M. Cutkosky, H. Park, Design Space Navigation as a Collaborative Aid Artificial Intelligence in Design ’94. pp. 611- 623 ,(1994) , 10.1007/978-94-011-0928-4_35
Thomas R. Gruber, Gregory R. Olsen, An ontology for engineering mathematics principles of knowledge representation and reasoning. pp. 258- 269 ,(1994) , 10.1016/B978-1-4832-1452-8.50120-2
Michael R Genesereth, Richard E Fikes, Knowledge Interchange Format Version 3.0 Reference Manual logic in computer science. ,(1992)
William Mark, Jon Dukes-Schlossberg, Cosmos: A System for Supporting Engineering Negotiation Concurrent Engineering. ,vol. 2, pp. 173- 182 ,(1994) , 10.1177/1063293X9400200304
Dennis Bahler, Catherine Dupont, James Bowen, Mixed quantitative/qualitative method for evaluating compromise solutions to conflicts in collaborative design Ai Edam Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing. ,vol. 9, pp. 325- 336 ,(1995) , 10.1017/S0890060400002869
M. Klein, Supporting conflict resolution in cooperative design systems systems man and cybernetics. ,vol. 21, pp. 1379- 1390 ,(1991) , 10.1109/21.135683