Comparing the inhibitory thresholds of dairy manure co-digesters after prolonged acclimation periods: Part 1 – Performance and operating limits

作者: J.G. Usack , L.T. Angenent

DOI: 10.1016/J.WATRES.2015.05.055

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Co-digestion has been used to improve biogas yields and the long-term stability of anaerobic digesters compared mono-digestion; however, less is known about ultimate inhibition from co-substrates at their maximum loading rates mixing ratios because these limits cannot be practically tested by existing facilities. Here, we performed a controlled experiment with long operating periods ensure sufficient acclimation goal observe full benefit that can gained co-digestion. The three substrates: 1) food waste (FW); 2) alkaline hydrolysate (AH); 3) crude glycerol (GY) were individually co-digested dairy manure (MN) for more than 900 days using continuously stirred reactors mesophilic temperatures. Food caused no reduction in performance or when up total organic rate (OLR) 3.9 g volatile solids (VS)·L −1 ·Day (MN:FW = 51:49; VS basis), resulting specific methane yield (SMY) 297 ± 3 mL CH 4 ·g combined wastes. Alkaline was OLR 2.7 g VS·L (MN:AH = 75:25) corresponding SMY 299 ± 6 mL CH . However, free ammonia concentration reached levels previously reported as inhibitory, may have led observed accumulation fatty acids higher rates. Crude co-digestion resulted an optimum 549 ± 25 mL CH 3.2 g VS·L (MN:GY = 62:38). Stable digestion beyond this level prohibited long-chain foaming. These results implement effective strategies. Co-substrates possess similar inhibiting characteristics should monitored prevent severe instability high ratios.

参考文章(42)
H.-S. Shin, S.-H. Kim, C.-Y. Lee, S.-Y. Nam, Inhibitory effects of long-chain fatty acids on VFA degradation and β-oxidation Water Science and Technology. ,vol. 47, pp. 139- 146 ,(2003) , 10.2166/WST.2003.0559
Alcina Pereira, Manuel Mota, Madalena Alves, Degradation of oleic acid in anaerobic filters : the effect of inoculum acclimatization and biomass recirculation Water Environment Research. ,vol. 73, pp. 612- 621 ,(2001) , 10.2175/106143001X143349
Z. Mladenovska, S. Dabrowski, B.K. Ahring, Anaerobic digestion of manure and mixture of manure with lipids: biogas reactor performance and microbial community analysis. Water Science and Technology. ,vol. 48, pp. 271- 278 ,(2003) , 10.2166/WST.2003.0412
Andrew Eaton, A.E. Greenberg, Lenore S. Clesceri, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater Published in <b>1998</b> in Washington DC) by American public health association. ,(1992)
Jerald A Lalman, David M Bagley, Anaerobic degradation and methanogenic inhibitory effects of oleic and stearic acids. Water Research. ,vol. 35, pp. 2975- 2983 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00593-5
Sami Luste, Helvi Heinonen-Tanski, Sari Luostarinen, Co-digestion of dairy cattle slurry and industrial meat-processing by-products--effect of ultrasound and hygienization pre-treatments. Bioresource Technology. ,vol. 104, pp. 195- 201 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2011.11.003
F.J. Callaghan, D.A.J. Wase, K. Thayanithy, C.F. Forster, Continuous co-digestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure Biomass and Bioenergy. ,vol. 22, pp. 71- 77 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00057-5
Clark P. Bishop, C. Richard Shumway, The Economics of Dairy Anaerobic Digestion with Coproduct Marketing Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. ,vol. 31, pp. 394- 410 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1467-9353.2009.01445.X
W.F. Owen, D.C. Stuckey, J.B. Healy, L.Y. Young, P.L. McCarty, Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity Water Research. ,vol. 13, pp. 485- 492 ,(1979) , 10.1016/0043-1354(79)90043-5