Personalizing robot tutors to individuals' learning differences

作者: Daniel Leyzberg , Samuel Spaulding , Brian Scassellati

DOI: 10.1145/2559636.2559671

关键词:

摘要: In education research, there is a widely-cited result called “Bloom’s two sigma” that characterizes the differences in learning outcomes between students who receive one-on-one tutoring and those traditional classroom instruction [1]. Tutored scored 95th percentile, or sigmas above mean, on average, compared to received instruction. human-robot interaction however, relatively little work exploring potential benefits of personalizing robot’s actions an individual’s strengths weaknesses. this study, participants solved grid-based logic puzzles with help personalized non-personalized robot tutor. Participants’ puzzle solving times were control conditions (n=80). Although personalizations less sophisticated than what human tutor can do, we still witnessed “one-sigma” improvement (68th percentile) post-tests treatment groups. We present these results as evidence even simple yield significant educational assistive interactions. Categories Subject Descriptors I.2.9 [Artificial Intelligence]: Robotics; J.4 [Computer Applications]: Social And Behavioral Sciences—Psychology General Terms Experimentation

参考文章(15)
Iolanda Leite, Ginevra Castellano, André Pereira, Carlos Martinho, Ana Paiva, Long-term interactions with empathic robots: evaluating perceived support in children international conference on social robotics. pp. 298- 307 ,(2012) , 10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_30
Sooryun Son, Eunja Hyun, Hyunmin Yoon, Relationships between user experiences and children's perceptions of the education robot human-robot interaction. pp. 199- 200 ,(2010) , 10.5555/1734454.1734542
Chiung-Hsueh Yu, Hui-Lung Lee, Ling-Hwei Chen, An efficient algorithm for solving nonograms Applied Intelligence. ,vol. 35, pp. 18- 31 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S10489-009-0200-0
JaYoung Sung, Rebecca E. Grinter, Henrik I. Christensen, "Pimp My Roomba": designing for personalization human factors in computing systems. pp. 193- 196 ,(2009) , 10.1145/1518701.1518732
H. Kozima, C. Nakagawa, Y. Yasuda, Interactive robots for communication-care: a case-study in autism therapy robot and human interactive communication. pp. 341- 346 ,(2005) , 10.1109/ROMAN.2005.1513802
Min Kyung Lee, Jodi Forlizzi, Sara Kiesler, Paul Rybski, John Antanitis, Sarun Savetsila, Personalization in HRI Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI '12. pp. 319- 326 ,(2012) , 10.1145/2157689.2157804
C.D. Kidd, C. Breazeal, Robots at home: Understanding long-term human-robot interaction intelligent robots and systems. pp. 3230- 3235 ,(2008) , 10.1109/IROS.2008.4651113
Jun Ki Lee, Robert Lopez Toscano, Walter Dan Stiehl, Cynthia Breazeal, The design of a semi-autonomous robot avatar for family communication and education robot and human interactive communication. pp. 166- 173 ,(2008) , 10.1109/ROMAN.2008.4600661
Javier R. Movellan, Fumihide Tanaka, Ian R. Fasel, Cynthia Taylor, Paul Ruvolo, Micah Eckhardt, The RUBI project Proceeding of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction - HRI '07. pp. 333- 339 ,(2007) , 10.1145/1228716.1228761