Sellars Contra McDowell on Intuitional Content and the Myth of the Given

作者: Dionysis Christias

DOI: 10.1007/S11406-015-9632-4

关键词:

摘要: The aim of this paper is to properly situate and contrast McDowell’s Sellars’ views on intuitional content relate them their corresponding the myth Given. Although what McDowell calls ‘intuitional’ seem at first strikingly similar, a deeper level they are radically different. It will be suggested that divergence intimately related different understanding Given consists in how it should best avoided. also argued certain McDowell-inspired objections against viability Sellarsian concept Categorial actually misconstrue place notion system. If can considered as genuine version Myth (and has offered no compelling reasons for thinking otherwise) then account does indeed fall prey it. I shall further argue objection Sellars effect his proper sensibles compromises openness world ultimately fails, and, finally, suggest provide more promising way our thought experience rationally open itself than position.

参考文章(25)
John McDowell, Self-determining subjectivity and external constraint Internationales Jahrbuch des deutschen Idealismus = International Yearbook of German Idealism. pp. 21- 37 ,(2005)
Wilfrid Sellars, None, Empiricism and the philosophy of mind ,(1997)
Jay F. Rosenberg, Wilfrid Sellars: Fusing the Images ,(2007)
John Henry Mcdowell, Marcus Willaschek, John Mcdowell, Reason and Nature Lecture and Colloquium in Münster 1999 Lit. ,(2000)
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Hegel's philosophy of mind ,(1894)