Analysis of the Colorado potato beetle protection system in Finland

作者: J HEIKKILA , J PELTOLA

DOI: 10.1016/J.AGECON.2004.09.019

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Invasive species, including plants, insects and other pests, are a serious threat to agricultural production the environment in general. Finland has traditionally had favourable situation concerning invasives, partly due its isolated geographical location. The may now be changing one of currently increasing threats is Colorado potato beetle (CPB). designed CPB protection policy incorporating protected zone, which commonly used deal with invasive plant pests European countries. Within this randomly occurring invasions collectively fended off, prevent establishment permanent pest population minimise potential damage. This paper evaluates economics current programme, comparing hypothetical pre-emptive abandoned control relies on producers’ individual reactive measures. annual random modelled static stochastic framework. To date not been able establish Finland. According our analysis, exercised cost-efficient choice at point. relatively low expected invasion magnitude key factors supporting efficiency system. Another reason fairly small damage incurred. However, when become larger more frequent or strains cold-resistant, future change.

参考文章(12)
P. M. Harris, E. B. Radcliffe, K. V. Raman, Pest aspects of potato production. Part 2. Insect pests. Chapman and Hall. pp. 476- 506 ,(1992)
P. M. Harris, The potato crop : the scientific basis for improvement Chapman and Hall. ,(1978)
Charles Perrings, Mark Williamson, Silvana Dalmazzone, The economics of biological invasions Land Use and Water Resources Research. ,vol. 1, pp. 1- 9 ,(2000) , 10.4337/9781781008645
Charles Perrings, Mark Williamson, Edward B. Barbier, Doriana Delfino, Silvana Dalmazzone, Jason Shogren, Peter Simmons, Andrew Watkinson, Biological invasion risks and the public good: an economic perspective Conservation Ecology. ,vol. 6, pp. 1- 10 ,(2002) , 10.5751/ES-00396-060101
James Barrett, Kathleen Segerson, Prevention and Treatment in Environmental Policy Design Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. ,vol. 33, pp. 196- 213 ,(1997) , 10.1006/JEEM.1997.0983
J. HEIKKILÄ, J. PELTOLA, Conceptualising the economics of plant health protection against invasive pests Agricultural and Food Science. ,vol. 12, pp. 67- 81 ,(2003) , 10.23986/AFSCI.5743
David Pimentel, Lori Lach, Rodolfo Zuniga, Doug Morrison, None, Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States BioScience. ,vol. 50, pp. 53- 65 ,(2000) , 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0053:EAECON]2.3.CO;2
David Pimentel, S. McNair, J. Janecka, J. Wightman, C. Simmonds, C. O’Connell, E. Wong, L. Russel, J. Zern, T. Aquino, T. Tsomondo, Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal, and microbe invasions Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. ,vol. 84, pp. 1- 20 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00178-X
J. D. Mumford, Economic issues related to quarantine in international trade European Review of Agriculture Economics. ,vol. 29, pp. 329- 348 ,(2002) , 10.1093/EURRAG/29.3.329