What methods are being used to create an evidence base on the use of laboratory tests to monitor long-term conditions in primary care? A scoping review

作者: Martha M C Elwenspoek , Lauren J Scott , Katharine Alsop , Rita Patel , Jessica C Watson

DOI: 10.1093/FAMPRA/CMAA074

关键词:

摘要: Background Studies have shown unwarranted variation in test ordering among GP practices and regions, which may lead to patient harm increased health care costs. There is currently no robust evidence base inform guidelines on monitoring long-term conditions. Objectives To map the extent nature of research that provides use laboratory tests monitor conditions primary care, identify gaps existing research. Methods We performed a scoping review-a relatively new approach for mapping across broad topics-using data abstraction forms charting according framework. searched CINAHL, EMBASE MEDLINE April 2019. included studies aimed optimize determine costs, or related testing population with Results Ninety-four were included. Forty percent describe 36% investigate performance. Renal function (35%), HbA1c (23%) lipids (17%) most studied tests. Most applied cohort design using routinely collected (49%). found strategies improve outcomes, optimal intervals harms caused by over-testing. Conclusions Future needs address these evidence. High-level missing, i.e. randomized controlled trials comparing one strategy another quasi-experimental designs such as interrupted time series analysis if are not feasible.

参考文章(101)
Sumit R Majumdar, Rajdeep Padwal, Karen Tu, Zhongliang Chen, Norman R C Campbell, Finlay Aleck McAlister, Laboratory testing in newly treated elderly hypertensive patients without co-morbidities: a population-based cohort study. Open Medicine. ,vol. 1, ,(2007)
Mohammad Fareed Khan, Hajera Tabassum, Naif Alenzi, Sereen Hijazy, Samyah Alenzi, Sahar Subaie, Sabiha Fatima, Farah Aziz Khan, Noura Al Jameil, Sadia Arjumand, Comparative Study of Serum Copper, Iron, Magnesium, and Zinc in Type 2 Diabetes-Associated Proteinuria Biological Trace Element Research. ,vol. 168, pp. 321- 329 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S12011-015-0379-3
Farideh Razi, Ensieh Nasli Esfahani, Marjan Rahnamaye Farzami, Ali Tootee, Mostafa Qorbani, Soltan Ahmad Ebrahimi, Mehrzad Nahid, Parvin Pasalar, Effect of the different assays of HbA1c on diabetic patients monitoring Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders. ,vol. 14, pp. 65- 65 ,(2015) , 10.1186/S40200-015-0193-7
Jamie J. Coleman, Sarah E. McDowell, Stephen J. W. Evans, Paramjit S. Gill, Robin E. Ferner, Oversight: a retrospective study of biochemical monitoring in patients beginning antihypertensive drug treatment in primary care British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. ,vol. 70, pp. 109- 117 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1365-2125.2010.03654.X
Nabil Y Kurashi, Marwan A Bakarman, Muhammad Hanif, Utilization of laboratory investigations in primary health care centers in Al-khobar, saudi arabia. Journal of Family and Community Medicine. ,vol. 4, pp. 37- 45 ,(1997)
Peter D. Kent, Clement J. Michet, Harvinder S. Luthra, Risk factors for methotrexate-induced abnormal laboratory monitoring results in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The Journal of Rheumatology. ,vol. 31, pp. 1727- 1731 ,(2004)
S Lenzi, O Giampietro, G Giovannitti, T Sampietro, R Miccoli, R Navalesi, The clinical usefulness of glycated hemoglobin in monitoring diabetes mellitus: a long-term study. Clinical Chemistry. ,vol. 33, pp. 55- 56 ,(1987) , 10.1093/CLINCHEM/33.1.55
Jobert Richie N Nansseu, Joël Fokom-Domgue, Jean Jacques N Noubiap, Eric V Balti, Eugène Sobngwi, André Pascal Kengne, None, Fructosamine measurement for diabetes mellitus diagnosis and monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol BMJ Open. ,vol. 5, ,(2015) , 10.1136/BMJOPEN-2015-007689