Strategic Communication and the Marketization of Educational Exchange
作者： Hamilton Bean
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-43829-0_6
关键词:
摘要: This chapter describes how the marketization discourse that typifies US strategic communication also influences meanings and practices of educational exchange. Through an analysis 5 presentations 34 program evaluations provided by State Department’s Bureau Educational Cultural Affairs, this explores risks associated with for development mutual understanding peace.
springer.com
sci-hub.st 参考文章(23)
United States. Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction, The Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction: Report to the President of the United States ,(2005)
David McKie, Debashish Munshi, Reconfiguring Public Relations: Ecology, Equity and Enterprise ,(2007)
Steven R. Corman, Angela Trethewey, H. Lloyd Goodall, Weapons of mass persuasion : strategic communication to combat violent extremism Peter Lang. ,(2008)
J. Vernon Jensen, Ethical Issues in the Communication Process ,(1997)
James E. Grunig, Todd Hunt, Managing Public Relations ,(1984)
Cynthia Hardy, Nelson Phillips, Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction ,(2002)
Kevin Moloney, Rethinking Public Relations20011Rethinking Public Relations. Routledge, 2000. 196 pp., ISBN: ISBN: 04152 17598 £55 Corporate Communications: An International Journal. ,vol. 6, pp. 53- 54 ,(2001) , 10.1108/CCIJ.2001.6.1.53.1
Delma Campbell, International Education and the Impact of the ‘War on Terrorism’ Irish Studies in International Affairs. ,vol. 16, pp. 127- 154 ,(2005) , 10.3318/ISIA.2005.16.1.127
Alan I. Marcus, `Would you like fries with that, Sir?' The evolution of management theories and the rise and fall of total quality management within the American federal government Management & Organizational History. ,vol. 3, pp. 311- 338 ,(2008) , 10.1177/1744935908095413
Edward Comor, Hamilton Bean, America’s ‘engagement’ delusion Critiquing a public diplomacy consensus International Communication Gazette. ,vol. 74, pp. 203- 220 ,(2012) , 10.1177/1748048511432603