An experimental analysis of impulsivity and impulse control in humans.

作者: Jay V. Solnick , Catherine H. Kannenberg , David A. Eckerman , Marcus B. Waller

DOI: 10.1016/0023-9690(80)90021-1

关键词:

摘要: Abstract In choosing between small, immediate and large, delayed reward, an organism behaves impulsively if it chooses the small reward shows impulse control large reward. Work with nonhumans suggests that impulsivity may be derived from gradients of reinforcement. A model developed by Ainslie Rachlin preference for rewards should a function when choice is made: no delay preferred to X, but adding T both alternatives shift Three experiments investigated this reversal in humans, using termination 90 dba white noise as reinforcing event. Experiment 1 showed under some instructional conditions 90-sec off was over 120-sec after 60-sec delay, shifted 15-sec (T) added alternatives. 2 replicated two three rather than values T. 3 confirmed effect humans committed themselves commitment could made time before presentation These data support Ainslie-Rachlin extend human behavior.

参考文章(20)
Douglas J. Navarick, Edmund Fantino, Self-control and general models of choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. ,vol. 2, pp. 75- 87 ,(1976) , 10.1037/0097-7403.2.1.75
Howard Rachlin, Leonard Green, Commitment, choice and self-control Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. ,vol. 17, pp. 15- 22 ,(1972) , 10.1901/JEAB.1972.17-15
Frank A. Logan, Douglas Spanier, Chaining and nonchaining delay of reinforcement. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. ,vol. 72, pp. 98- 101 ,(1970) , 10.1037/H0029322
Marvin Z. Deluty, Self-control and impulsiveness involving aversive events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes. ,vol. 4, pp. 250- 266 ,(1978) , 10.1037/0097-7403.4.3.250
George Ainslie, Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 82, pp. 463- 496 ,(1975) , 10.1037/H0076860
William M. Baum, Howard C. Rachlin, Choice as time allocation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. ,vol. 12, pp. 861- 874 ,(1969) , 10.1901/JEAB.1969.12-861
Stephen R. Schroeder, James G. Holland, REINFORCEMENT OF EYE MOVEMENT WITH CONCURRENT SCHEDULES1 Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. ,vol. 12, pp. 897- 903 ,(1969) , 10.1901/JEAB.1969.12-897
C. M. Bradshaw, E. Szabadi, P. Bevan, Behavior of humans in variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. ,vol. 26, pp. 135- 141 ,(1976) , 10.1901/JEAB.1976.26-135
Byron A. Matthews, Eliot Shimoff, A. Charles Catania, Terje Sagvolden, Uninstructed human responding: sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. ,vol. 27, pp. 453- 467 ,(1977) , 10.1901/JEAB.1977.27-453