Complex deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty for complex bullous keratopathy with severe vision loss.

作者: Ting Huang , Yujuan Wang , Na Gao , Tao Wang , Jianping Ji

DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0B013E3181859FA0

关键词:

摘要: PURPOSE To determine the efficacy and postoperative complications of complex deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK) when used for management bullous keratopathy with severe vision loss. METHODS Twelve consecutive eyes other associated intraocular abnormalities underwent DLEK which was combined surgeries such as vitrectomy, lens removal, secondary implantation. An air bubble in 9 an C3F8 gas 3 tissue support. Prospective data best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, corneal astigmatism, curvature were collected on all 12 preoperatively at 6, 9, months postoperatively. Average donor cell density recorded RESULTS Preoperatively, loss hand motions (n = 3), count fingers 7), 20/400 2). Best acuity improved 83% 20/67 or better 42% (5/12) 20/100 66% (8/12) Vision not three due to coexistent retinal disease. Four aphakic implantation later 4-6 after DLEK, increased from 20/200 better. At postoperatively, average astigmatism 2.3 +/- 0.5 diopters 44.0 0.9 diopters, respectively. central thickness postoperatively (541.3 26.7 microm) significantly thinner than that before surgery (673.8 77.5 microm, P < 0.01). Preoperative 2685.1 193.9 cells/mm. 1920.1 94.0 cells/mm (27.3% loss) primary 1866.3 92.8 (33.9% surgery. Postoperative usually occurred within After surgery, showed narrow gaps between border graft host. Epithelial bullae these areas recurred 2 but disappeared months. There one dislocation this series, no pupillary block cases, failures. CONCLUSIONS In cases loss, is a feasible effective procedure improve functional level most patients. can be successfully aphakia anterior segment without high risk failure. Mild early did affect outcomes survival if managed appropriately.

参考文章(26)
Francis W. Price, Marianne O. Price, Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: Early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. ,vol. 32, pp. 411- 418 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.JCRS.2005.12.078
Berthold Seitz, Achim Langenbucher, Michael Küchle, Gottfried O.H Naumann, Impact of graft diameter on corneal power and the regularity of postkeratoplasty astigmatism before and after suture removal. Ophthalmology. ,vol. 110, pp. 2162- 2167 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00659-6
Stephen U. Stechschulte, Dimitri T. Azar, Complications after penetrating keratoplasty. International Ophthalmology Clinics. ,vol. 40, pp. 27- 43 ,(2000) , 10.1097/00004397-200040010-00005
Sanjay V. Patel, Jay W. McLaren, David O. Hodge, Keith H. Baratz, Scattered Light and Visual Function in a Randomized Trial of Deep Lamellar Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty American Journal of Ophthalmology. ,vol. 145, pp. 97- 105 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.AJO.2007.09.002
Rajesh Fogla, Prema Padmanabhan, Initial Results of Small Incision Deep Lamellar Endothelial Keratoplasty (DLEK) American Journal of Ophthalmology. ,vol. 141, pp. 346- 351 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.AJO.2005.10.010
Andreea Chih, Miguel Lugo, Dianne Kowing, Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty: an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty. Optometry and Vision Science. ,vol. 85, pp. 152- ,(2008) , 10.1097/OPX.0B013E3181646D2F
Aya Maeno, Joel Naor, Hung Ming Lee, William S. Hunter, David S. Rootman, Three Decades of Corneal Transplantation: Indications and Patient Characteristics Cornea. ,vol. 19, pp. 7- 11 ,(2000) , 10.1097/00003226-200001000-00002