Independent feedback on clinical audit performance: a multi‐professional pilot study

作者: Paul Bowie , Pat Quinn , Ailsa Power

DOI: 10.1108/14777270910976148

关键词:

摘要: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the acceptability and educational impact independent feedback on clinical audit performance different groups healthcare professionals by trained colleagues.Design/methodology/approach This a pilot study involving review criterion significant event analysis (SEA) attempts west Scotland dentists, pharmacists, physiotherapists, practice managers nurse practitioners colleagues using validated instruments. Audit, SEA reports were content‐analysed. Data pre‐ post‐study attitudes, experiences knowledge levels collected questionnaire. T‐tests for differences in mean group scores calculated, along with 95 per cent confidence intervals differences. A difference 1.0 or greater would be indicative gain.Findings total 34 participants submitted 54 reports, 20 submitting both (58.9 cent). In total, 14/20 ...

参考文章(21)
Jill Murie, Janette McCrae, Bowie Paul, None, The peer review pilot project: a potential system to support GP appraisal in NHS Scotland? Education for primary care. ,vol. 20, pp. 34- 40 ,(2009) , 10.1080/14739879.2009.11493759
A. E. Powell, R. K. Rushmer, H. T. O. Davies, Healthcare professionals’ views on clinician engagement in quality improvement The Health Foundation. ,(2007)
T. S. Murray, L. M. Campbell, J. G. R. Howie, Summative assessment: a pilot project in the west of Scotland. British Journal of General Practice. ,vol. 43, pp. 430- 434 ,(1993)
J McKay, T S Murray, J R Lough, Audit and summative assessment: a criterion-referenced marking schedule. British Journal of General Practice. ,vol. 45, pp. 607- 609 ,(1995)
John McKay, Lindsey Pope, Paul Bowie, Murray Lough, External feedback in general practice: a focus group study of trained peer reviewers of significant event analyses. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. ,vol. 15, pp. 142- 147 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1365-2753.2008.00969.X
Anna Chur-Hansen, Leslie F Koopowitz, Formative Feedback in Teaching Undergraduate Psychiatry Academic Psychiatry. ,vol. 29, pp. 66- 68 ,(2005) , 10.1176/APPI.AP.29.1.66
John McKay, Annabel Shepherd, Paul Bowie, Murray Lough, Acceptability and educational impact of a peer feedback model for significant event analysis. Medical Education. ,vol. 42, pp. 1210- 1217 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1365-2923.2008.03235.X
A. Miles, P. Bentley, A. Polychronis, N. Price, J. Grey, Clinical audit in the National Health Service: fact or fiction? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. ,vol. 2, pp. 29- 35 ,(1996) , 10.1111/J.1365-2753.1996.TB00026.X
Paul Bowie, John McKay, Lilian Murray, Murray Lough, Judging the quality of clinical audit by general practitioners: a pilot study comparing the assessments of medical peers and NHS audit specialists Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. ,vol. 14, pp. 1038- 1043 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1365-2753.2008.00941.X
Paul Bowie, Lindsey Pope, Murray Lough, A review of the current evidence base for significant event analysis Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. ,vol. 14, pp. 520- 536 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1365-2753.2007.00908.X