Procedural Rationality Review after Animal Defenders International: A Constructively Critical Approach
DOI: 10.1017/S157401961900021X
关键词:
摘要: Procedural rationality review – Quality of law-making – Fundamental rights – Relation to margin of appreciation – Guidelines to avoid the use of double standards
sci-hub.se 参考文章(20)
Fiona de Londras, Kanstantsin Dzehtsiarou, Managing Judicial Innovation in the European Court of Human Rights Human Rights Law Review. ,vol. 15, pp. 523- 547 ,(2015) , 10.1093/HRLR/NGV020
Elaine Mak, Judicial Review of Regulatory Instruments: The Least Imperfect Alternative? Legisprudence. ,vol. 6, pp. 301- 319 ,(2012) , 10.5235/17521467.6.3.301
Başak Çalı, Anne Koch, Nicola Bruch, None, The Legitimacy of Human Rights Courts: A Grounded Interpretivist Analysis of the European Court of Human Rights Human Rights Quarterly. ,vol. 35, pp. 955- 984 ,(2013) , 10.1353/HRQ.2013.0057
Andrew Scott, ‘A Monstrous and Unjustifiable Infringement’?: Political Expression and the Broadcasting Ban on Advocacy Advertising Modern Law Review. ,vol. 66, pp. 224- 244 ,(2003) , 10.1111/1468-2230.6602003
M. Goldoni, Two internal critiques of political constitutionalism International Journal of Constitutional Law. ,vol. 10, pp. 926- 949 ,(2012) , 10.1093/ICON/MOS033
Klaus Meßerschmidt, The Race to Rationality Review and the Score of the German Federal Constitutional Court Legisprudence. ,vol. 6, pp. 347- 378 ,(2012) , 10.5235/17521467.6.3.347
K. Lenaerts, The European Court of Justice and Process-Oriented Review Yearbook of European Law. ,vol. 31, pp. 3- 16 ,(2012) , 10.1093/YEL/YES009
Patricia Popelier, Catherine Van De Heyning, Procedural Rationality: Giving Teeth to the Proportionality Analysis European Constitutional Law Review. ,vol. 9, pp. 230- 262 ,(2013) , 10.1017/S1574019612001137
Matthew Saul, The European Court of Human Rights’ Margin of Appreciation and the Processes of National Parliaments Human Rights Law Review. ,vol. 15, pp. 745- 774 ,(2015) , 10.1093/HRLR/NGV027