Robotic infant surgery with 3 mm instruments: a study in piglets of less than 10 kg body weight.

作者: Ibrahim Alkatout , Henning Wieker , Jan-Hendrik Egberts , Katja Reischig , Roberts Meiksans

DOI: 10.1007/S11701-021-01229-0

关键词:

摘要: No data exist concerning the appication of a new robotic system with 3 mm instruments (Senhance®, Transenterix) in infants and small children. Therefore, aim this study was to test for its feasibility, performance safety pediatric abdominal thoracic surgery piglets simulating body weight lower than 10 kg. 34 procedures (from explorative laparoscopy thoracoscopic esophageal repair) were performed 12 median age 23 (interquartile range: 12–28) days 6.9 (6.1–7.3) kg. The Senhance® used instruments, 10 mm 3D 0° or 30° videoscope advanced energy devices, setup consisted master console three separate arms. amount, size, position applied ports, their distance as well between operator arms robot, external internal collisions, complications recorded analyzed. We able perform all planned surgical less 7 kg. encountered two non-robot associated (bleeding from inferior caval hepatic vein) which led termination live procedures. Technical limitations reaction time speed camera movement eye tracking, excessive bending intermittent need re-calibration fulcrum point. Robotic newborn infant appears technically feasible system. Software adjustments sensitivity point calibration algorithm adjust increased compliance wall infants, therefore reducing be implemented by manufacturer result our study. To further evaluate system, prospective trials comparing it open, laparoscopic other systems are needed.

参考文章(17)
Hani J. Marcus, Archie Hughes-Hallett, Thomas P. Cundy, Guang-Zhong Yang, Ara Darzi, Dipankar Nandi, da Vinci robot-assisted keyhole neurosurgery: a cadaver study on feasibility and safety. Neurosurgical Review. ,vol. 38, pp. 367- 371 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S10143-014-0602-2
John J. Meehan, Anthony Sandler, Pediatric robotic surgery: A single-institutional review of the first 100 consecutive cases Surgical Endoscopy. ,vol. 22, pp. 177- 182 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S00464-007-9418-2
Hope T. Jackson, Timothy D. Kane, Advances in minimally invasive surgery in pediatric patients Advances in Pediatrics. ,vol. 61, pp. 149- 195 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.YAPD.2014.03.011
Carol Kilkenny, William J. Browne, Innes C. Cuthill, Michael Emerson, Douglas G. Altman, Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research PLoS Biology. ,vol. 8, pp. e1000412- 99 ,(2010) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PBIO.1000412
A.A. Thakre, Y. Bailly, L.W. Sun, F. Van Meer, C.K. Yeung, Is Smaller Workspace a Limitation for Robot Performance in Laparoscopy? Journal of Urology. ,vol. 179, pp. 1138- 1143 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.JURO.2007.10.091
J.B. Finkelstein, A.C. Levy, M.V. Silva, L. Murray, C. Delaney, P. Casale, How to decide which infant can have robotic surgery? Just do the math. Journal of Pediatric Urology. ,vol. 11, pp. 170- ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JPUROL.2014.11.020
John J. Meehan, Robotic Surgery in Small Children: Is There Room for This? Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. ,vol. 19, pp. 707- 712 ,(2009) , 10.1089/LAP.2008.0178
M. Anderberg, C. Clementson Kockum, E. Arnbjornsson, Morgagni Hernia Repair in a Small Child Using da Vinci Robotic Instruments - A Case Report. European Journal of Pediatric Surgery. ,vol. 19, pp. 110- 112 ,(2009) , 10.1055/S-2008-1038500
Gloria Pelizzo, Ghassan Nakib, Ilaria Goruppi, Luigi Avolio, Piero Romano, Alessandro Raffaele, Federico Scorletti, Simonetta Mencherini, Valeria Calcaterra, Pediatric robotic pyeloplasty in patients weighing less than 10 kg initial experience. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. ,vol. 24, ,(2014) , 10.1097/SLE.0B013E31828E3F18
Andreana Bütter, Neil Merritt, Sumit Dave, Establishing a pediatric robotic surgery program in Canada. Journal of Robotic Surgery. ,vol. 11, pp. 207- 210 ,(2017) , 10.1007/S11701-016-0646-0