High -stakes testing: Truth or consequential validity
作者： Mary L Zanetti
DOI:
关键词:
摘要:
参考文章(25)
Charles S. Reichardt, Sharon F. Rallis, The Qualitative-Quantitative Debate: New Perspectives. New Directions for Program Evaluation. ,(1994)
John W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches ,(1966)
Elizabeth Adams St. Pierre, Laurel Richardson, Writing: A method of inquiry. Sage Publications, Inc. ,(1994)
Thomas Maguire, J.A. Hattie, Brian Haig, None, Construct validity and achievement assessment Alberta Journal of Educational Research. ,vol. 40, pp. 109- 126 ,(1994)
Lee J. Cronbach, Paul E. Meehl, Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 52, pp. 281- 302 ,(1955) , 10.1037/H0040957
William A. Mehrens, The Consequences of Consequential Validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. ,vol. 16, pp. 16- 18 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1745-3992.1997.TB00588.X
Samuel Messick, Test validity and the ethics of assessment. American Psychologist. ,vol. 35, pp. 1012- 1027 ,(1980) , 10.1037/0003-066X.35.11.1012
ROBERT M. JACKSON, J. W. M. ROTHNEY, A Comparative Study of the Mailed Questionnaire and the Interview in Follow‐up Studies The Personnel and Guidance Journal. ,vol. 39, pp. 569- 571 ,(1961) , 10.1002/J.2164-4918.1961.TB02011.X
William A. Mehrens, Consequences of Assessment: What is the Evidence? Education Policy Analysis Archives. ,vol. 6, pp. 13- ,(1998) , 10.14507/EPAA.V6N13.1998
Robert L. Linn, Performance Assessment: Policy Promises and Technical Measurement Standards Educational Researcher. ,vol. 23, pp. 4- 14 ,(1994) , 10.3102/0013189X023009004