The role of the frontal and parietal cortex in proactive and reactive inhibitory control: A transcranial direct current stimulation study
作者： Ying Cai , Siyao Li , Jing Liu , Dawei Li , Zifang Feng
DOI: 10.1162/JOCN_A_00888
关键词:
摘要: Mounting evidence suggests that response inhibition involves both proactive and reactive inhibitory control, yet its underlying neural mechanisms remain elusive. In particular, the roles of right inferior frontal gyrus IFG parietal lobe IPL in control are still under debate. This study aimed at examining causal role using transcranial direct current stimulation tDCS stop signal task. Twenty-two participants completed three sessions task, anodal IFG, IPL, or primary visual cortex VC; 1.5 mA for 15 min, respectively. The VC served as active condition. effect each condition was calculated difference between pre-and post-tDCS performance. Proactive indexed by RT increase go trials preparatory cost, RT. Compared to stimulation, but not facilitated control. However, facilitation mediated Furthermore, did affect intraindividual variability These results suggest a
mitpressjournals.org
researchgate.net 
acm.org 参考文章(83)
André Russowsky Brunoni, Bernardo Sampaio-Junior, Adriano Henrique Moffa, Lucas Borrione, Barbara Schwair Nogueira, Luana Vanessa Marotti Aparício, Beatriz Veronezi, Marina Moreno, Raquel Albano Fernandes, Diego Tavares, Priscila Vilela Silveira Bueno, Ole Seibt, Marom Bikson, Renerio Fraguas, Isabela Martins Benseñor, None, The Escitalopram versus Electric Current Therapy for Treating Depression Clinical Study (ELECT-TDCS): rationale and study design of a non-inferiority, triple-arm, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Sao Paulo Medical Journal. ,vol. 133, pp. 252- 263 ,(2015) , 10.1590/1516-3180.2014.00351712
SUSAN MURTHA, ROXANNA CISMARU, RANDALL WAECHTER, HOWARD CHERTKOW, Increased variability accompanies frontal lobe damage in dementia. Journal of The International Neuropsychological Society. ,vol. 8, pp. 360- 372 ,(2002) , 10.1017/S1355617702813170
D. J. Sharp, V. Bonnelle, X. De Boissezon, C. F. Beckmann, S. G. James, M. C. Patel, M. A. Mehta, Distinct frontal systems for response inhibition, attentional capture, and error processing Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 107, pp. 6106- 6111 ,(2010) , 10.1073/PNAS.1000175107
Adam R. Aron, Trevor W. Robbins, Russell A. Poldrack, Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. ,vol. 18, pp. 177- 185 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.TICS.2013.12.003
F. Verbruggen, A. R. Aron, M. A. Stevens, C. D. Chambers, Theta burst stimulation dissociates attention and action updating in human inferior frontal cortex Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 107, pp. 13966- 13971 ,(2010) , 10.1073/PNAS.1001957107
Frederick Verbruggen, Gordon D. Logan, Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. ,vol. 35, pp. 835- 854 ,(2009) , 10.1037/A0012726
Jeri S. Janowsky, Arthur P. Shimamura, Larry R. Squire, Source memory impairment in patients with frontal lobe lesions Neuropsychologia. ,vol. 27, pp. 1043- 1056 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0028-3932(89)90184-X
B. J. Casey, L. H. Somerville, I. H. Gotlib, O. Ayduk, N. T. Franklin, M. K. Askren, J. Jonides, M. G. Berman, N. L. Wilson, T. Teslovich, G. Glover, V. Zayas, W. Mischel, Y. Shoda, Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 108, pp. 14998- 15003 ,(2011) , 10.1073/PNAS.1108561108
Janna van Belle, Matthijs Vink, Sarah Durston, Bram B. Zandbelt, Common and unique neural networks for proactive and reactive response inhibition revealed by independent component analysis of functional MRI data. NeuroImage. ,vol. 103, pp. 65- 74 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2014.09.014
Davood Tofighi, David P. MacKinnon, RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals Behavior Research Methods. ,vol. 43, pp. 692- 700 ,(2011) , 10.3758/S13428-011-0076-X