Proving the Effectiveness of the Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery (FRS) Skills Curriculum: A Single-blinded, Multispecialty, Multi-institutional Randomized Control Trial

作者: Richard M. Satava , Dimitrios Stefanidis , Jeffrey S. Levy , Roger Smith , John R. Martin

DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003220

关键词:

摘要: MINI: Question: Is the Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery (FRS) proficiency-based progression curriculum effective for teaching basic robotic surgery skills? Findings In an international multi-institutional, multispecialty, blinded, randomized control trial, implementation FRS skills using various simulation platforms led to improved performance surgical trainees on a transfer test compared with controls.Meaning: The is simulation-based course training proficiency before surgeons apply those clinically. Objective To demonstrate noninferiority fundamentals over current paradigms and identify ideal platform. Summary background data There currently no validated, uniformly accepted in skills. Methods Single-blinded parallel-group trial at 12 American College Surgeons (ACS) Accredited Education Institutes (AEI). Thirty-three experts 123 inexperienced were enrolled between April 2015 November 2016. Benchmarks (proficiency levels) 7 Dome tasks established based expert performance. Participants then randomly assigned 4 groups: (n = 29), dV-Trainer 30), DVSS 32) that trained benchmarks locally available curricula. primary outcome was participant after task errors duration 5 (knot tying, continuous suturing, cutting, dissection, vessel coagulation) avian tissue model (transfer-test). Secondary outcomes included cognitive scores, GEARS ratings, robot familiarity checklist scores. Results All groups demonstrated significant improvement (P Conclusions We provide evidence effectiveness by demonstrating better following controls test. therefore argue its across programs these

参考文章(27)
Anthony G. Gallagher, Gerald C. O'Sullivan, Gerald Leonard, Brendan P. Bunting, Kieran J. McGlade, Objective structured assessment of technical skills and checklist scales reliability compared for high stakes assessments. Anz Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 84, pp. 568- 573 ,(2014) , 10.1111/J.1445-2197.2012.06236.X
Richard L. Angelo, Richard K.N. Ryu, Robert A. Pedowitz, William Beach, Joseph Burns, Julie Dodds, Larry Field, Mark Getelman, Rhett Hobgood, Louis McIntyre, Anthony G. Gallagher, A Proficiency-Based Progression Training Curriculum Coupled With a Model Simulator Results in the Acquisition of a Superior Arthroscopic Bankart Skill Set. Arthroscopy. ,vol. 31, pp. 1854- 1871 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.ARTHRO.2015.07.001
Andrea Moglia, Vincenzo Ferrari, Luca Morelli, Mauro Ferrari, Franco Mosca, Alfred Cuschieri, A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Simulators for Robot-assisted Surgery European Urology. ,vol. 69, pp. 1065- 1080 ,(2016) , 10.1016/J.EURURO.2015.09.021
Roger Smith, Vipul Patel, Richard Satava, Fundamentals of robotic surgery: a course of basic robotic surgery skills based upon a 14-society consensus template of outcomes measures and curriculum development The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. ,vol. 10, pp. 379- 384 ,(2014) , 10.1002/RCS.1559
Michael Connolly, Johnathan Seligman, Andrew Kastenmeier, Matthew Goldblatt, Jon C. Gould, Validation of a virtual reality-based robotic surgical skills curriculum Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. ,vol. 28, pp. 1691- 1694 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S00464-013-3373-X
Winfred Arthur Jr., Winston Bennett Jr., Pamela L. Stanush, Theresa L. McNelly, Factors That Influence Skill Decay and Retention: A Quantitative Review and Analysis Human Performance. ,vol. 11, pp. 57- 101 ,(1998) , 10.1207/S15327043HUP1101_3
Nabeel A. Arain, Genevieve Dulan, Deborah C. Hogg, Robert V. Rege, Cathryn E. Powers, Seifu T. Tesfay, Linda S. Hynan, Daniel J. Scott, Comprehensive proficiency-based inanimate training for robotic surgery: reliability, feasibility, and educational benefit Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. ,vol. 26, pp. 2740- 2745 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S00464-012-2264-X
Gunnar Ahlberg, Lars Enochsson, Anthony G Gallagher, Leif Hedman, Christian Hogman, David A McClusky III, Stig Ramel, C Daniel Smith, Dag Arvidsson, None, Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. American Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 193, pp. 797- 804 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.AMJSURG.2006.06.050
Dimitrios Stefanidis, Optimal acquisition and assessment of proficiency on simulators in surgery. Surgical Clinics of North America. ,vol. 90, pp. 475- 489 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.SUC.2010.02.010
Boris Zevin, Jeffrey S. Levy, Richard M. Satava, Teodor P. Grantcharov, A consensus-based framework for design, validation, and implementation of simulation-based training curricula in surgery. Journal of The American College of Surgeons. ,vol. 215, pp. 580- 586 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.JAMCOLLSURG.2012.05.035